ASH Regan has argued SNP members should be allowed to change their vote if they wish to, following a recent row over the reporting of membership numbers.
The Edinburgh Eastern MSP’s team put out a statement which said she has put forward “proposals” to interim party chief executive Michael Russell that “provide assurance to members with minimum disruption to the election process that we can move ahead constructively on”.
She has highlighted the facility that exists within Mi-Voice – the firm tasked with running the ballot – to allow members who have already chosen their preferred candidate to alter their vote.
Regan has also said candidates should be allowed to send one email using the SNP mailing system to members with a “last minute updated message that reflects current events”.
READ MORE: Kevin McKenna: SNP’s rivals are hardly a font of political talent
Over the weekend, Peter Murrell resigned as chief executive after it was admitted that the media was given false information about the number of members who had left the party in recent years. Russell has taken on the role for the last week of the leadership contest on an interim basis.
An article that said the SNP lost 30,000 members in a few years was initially dismissed by party HQ.
However, after the SNP leadership contenders requested the official figures, the 30,000 figure was found to be accurate. The row led to the resignation of SNP communications chief Murray Foote, followed by Murrell standing down the next day.
Regan’s team said in a statement: “Due to the volatile nature of recent events Ash Regan has held off from media to forge a path forward in conjunction with SNP HQ.
“The campaign team thanks Mike Russell for stepping in and understanding the situation.
“There has been a surge in traffic in our campaign mailbox and social media from concerned members, looking for guidance on whether the ballot will go ahead unaltered or if the ballot will be reset.
“My team have put forward proposals that provide assurance to members with minimum disruption to the election process that we can move ahead constructively on.
“In 2015, selection contests for Westminster candidatures had varying end dates. In some cases, candidates were removed from the ballot before a race ended, where this happened members were able to update their vote. The facility exists within the Mi-Voice system.
“This would have the benefit of not disrupting members who are happy with their vote while providing an opportunity to reconsider for those who are not.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson must lose Tory whip if found guilty of partygate lies, SNP say
“In addition, each candidate would be allowed to send one email to the members using the SNP mailing system - allowing a last minute updated message that reflects current events.
“We thank Mike for taking this suggestion seriously and lend our support to the integrity of the ballot. It is important that all parties respect the outcome of the ballot and give full support to the new leader of the SNP.”
All three candidates put pressure on the party last week to release membership numbers while Kate Forbes and Regan called for independent auditors to oversee the election.
Yousaf told The National he disagreed with Regan and doesn't think the SNP should change the system at this late stage.
He said: “I don't think in the last seven days of this contest that we need to be reopening ballots or changing the process.”
Asked if the vote should be started afresh, Yousaf added: “No. It’s clear that all three candidates have now said they have faith in the integrity of the ballot and that all three will respect the outcome of the ballot. That’s good.
"I’m pleased that the other candidates have agreed with my position that I’ve had from the beginning, that the integrity of the ballot is not in question."
Asked if people should be able to change vote, he said: “I just don’t think it’s needed, given that all three candidates say they respect the integrity of the ballot. I don’t know why in the last week we’d want to change the system, which could probably cause some level of confusion.”
Forbes said on Monday morning she would “like to get to the end” of the leadership contest as she reaffirmed her confidence in the voting process.
The Finance Secretary admitted the events of the last few days have “hurt” members including herself.
However, she said she was “very confident” in the party’s ability to run the election properly.
She did add though that it remains her position an independent third-party auditor should be brought in.
Yousaf has said Murrell resigned over a “cock up not conspiracy” and maintained Nicola Sturgeon’s husband was a “good person who’s now done the honourable thing”.
The Health Secretary added he didn’t know why so many people had left the party but that he wanted to understand their reasons.
The SNP have been approached for comment about Regan's statement.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel