NICOLA Sturgeon fought back tears as she delivered an emotional farewell after eight years at the top of Scottish politics.
It is not strictly correct to speak of the outgoing First Minister as “returning to the backbenches” as she served in Alex Salmond’s shadow team from the moment she entered the Scottish Parliament in 1999.
MSPs across the spectrum say her departure marks a shift in the political landscape in this country – even Douglas Ross, after a stormy FMQs session paid tribute to her as a politician possessing a “staying power” many of her opponents could “could only ever wish for”.
Behind the scenes
But there is disquiet among her SNP comrades, whether or not they admit it openly. Two Humza Yousaf-backing MSPs were overheard in Holyrood on Thursday discussing whether they could bring themselves to the announcement on Monday – said to be taking place in Murrayfield Stadium.
READ MORE: SNP leadership race on a knife edge going into final stretch, poll suggests
One – who admitted they felt “shite” about the FM’s exit – fretted that they would not be able to hide their emotions if the vote were to go “the wrong way”.
Her political opponents smell blood – but seem painfully aware they have a long time to wait before the post-Sturgeon SNP is tested at a Scottish Parliament election.
Tory MSP Miles Briggs told The National there was a “seismic change” coming in Scottish politics and predicted that the coalition of voters Sturgeon is credited with holding together would unravel in the “coming months and years”.
Michael Marra, Labour’s education spokesperson said that Scottish politics was “more fluid now than it’s been for an awful long time” and Scottish LibDems leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said the political climate was “shifting in big and unpredictable ways”.
The final speech
The Parliment's canteen was visited by a table-full of Sturgeon’s office staff who watched on as she delivered her farewell speech, in which she personally thanked them for their service.
The public gallery was at capacity and, as is increasingly traditional, host to a climate change protester who called on the SNP leadership candidates to block a new oil development in the North Sea.
Schoolchildren watched on as the First Minister told MSPs: “No girl in our country now has any doubt that a woman can hold the highest office in the land.”
READ MORE: Douglas Ross rapped over 'liar' accusation during Nicola Sturgeon's fiery last FMQs
SNP MSP Karen Adam was keen to stress the FM’s feminist credentials when speaking about her legacy, saying Sturgeon should be praised for fostering a more “inviting” atmosphere for women to come to the top table.
Adam, a Yousaf-backer, also said she was not worried for the future of her party - saying Sturgeon and her outgoing deputy John Swinney had laid “very firm foundations” for the SNP’s future. The sentiment was echoed by her party colleague and Kate Forbes’s campaign manager Michelle Thomson.
Thomson said: “I have no doubt whatsoever that the SNP will come right back together behind whoever is elected and move forward.”
But despite internal party tensions, it is the Greens who hold the balance of power as it stands and members admit privately if Forbes or Ash Regan win the Bute House Agreement is as good as dead.
Sturgeon alluded to this briefly in her valedictory speech – noting the importance of the deal – in what may have been seen as the hint of a warning to her would-be successors Forbes and Regan, who have both said they would review the SNP/Greens agreement.
The sands of Scottish politics are shifting whatever view one takes on Sturgeon’s legacy and what it means for independence.
But she left her successor – whoever they are – with a message they should note: “Never forget that every day in this office is an opportunity to make something better for someone, somewhere in Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel