SSE’S announcement of a £100 million investment in the proposed at Coire Glas hydro-electric project in the Highlands once again quickens the pace of Scotland’s green jobs revolution.
As we look towards a low-carbon, net-zero future, I’m proud of the efforts being made to ensure our workforce has the skills and opportunities needed to transform Scotland’s economy and meet our environmental responsibilities.
But while we know green jobs are being created in Scotland, it’s important to have a widely accepted official definition so we can estimate how many.
This matters. Being able to measure and collect data on green jobs in Scotland will enable us to address gaps in skills provision, and recognise developing trends and opportunities.
We can also measure our progress against international competitors.
Various green job definitions are currently in use around the world. For example, applications to the Scottish Government’s Green Jobs Fund are judged against two criteria, both based on definitions used by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
READ MORE: Fury as Liz Truss nominates FOUR supporters for House of Lords seats
The bureau defines them as: “Jobs in businesses that produce goods or provide services that benefit the environment or conserve natural resources” and “jobs in which workers’ duties involve making their establishment’s production processes more environmentally friendly or use fewer natural resources.”
In November, the universities of Warwick and Strathclyde, on behalf of Skills Development Scotland, proposed a different approach taking account of the significant impact the transition to net zero will have on a much broader range of jobs.
It features three categories of green jobs – new and emerging, enhanced skills and knowledge, and increased demand.
Applying this definition to Scotland, I was pleased to see researchers conclude that we are leading the UK with the highest proportion of new and emerging green jobs. They estimate these now account for more than 100,000 of the total 2.5m jobs in Scotland, are better paid than non-green jobs – and that demand is growing.
In December last year, the PWC Green Jobs Barometer showed Scotland is the top-ranked nation in the UK for green jobs creation for the second year in a row.
But the figures are not the final word and researchers acknowledge more work is required to refine their approach.
So now the Office of National Statistics has entered the debate.
Following extensive consultation, including with the Scottish Government, it has announced that it will define a green job as: “Employment in an activity that contributes to protecting or restoring the environment, including those that mitigate or adapt to climate change.”
Over the coming months, the ONS will produce more detail on what this covers and look to estimate a total number of jobs.
But by any definition, Scotland is amongst the pace setters in the creation of green jobs, whether in renewable energy, hydrogen or the greening of the emerging space sector, and our National Strategy for Economic Transformation – and ongoing investment will help ensure that remains the case.
But we require a single definition – and a league table – to show just how well we are doing.
Knowledge is power, and knowing when a job is a green job is not only important, it is our key to opening up a whole new world of employment opportunities which net zero can bring.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel