ALISTER Jack has claimed that Scottish Government ministers have actively “sought conflict with Westminster, simply to further their goal of separation”.
The Scottish Secretary said that the election of a new SNP leader, who will then go on to become Scotland’s sixth first minister, offered a chance to “reset” the relationship with politicians in Westminster.
Back in January, it was Jack who blocked the passing of the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from becoming law despite it being overwhelmingly passed by MSPs.
Although he said he would have “fundamental political differences” with whoever the SNP’s new leader is, he stressed it should not stop the two governments working together.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf: It’s not about changing flags, but changing lives
He said: “Whoever wins the leadership election tomorrow faces a fundamental choice which will define their time as first minister.
“It is fair to say that they and I will have fundamental political differences. But this should not, must not, be an obstacle to us working together in the interests of Scottish families and businesses.
“Too often in the past Holyrood ministers have sought conflict with Westminster, simply to further their goal of separation.
“That has sapped the energy, focus and resolve which should have been directed to improving education, tackling drug deaths, and ensuring people have the reliable transport links they need.”
He added that the new leader had a chance “to make devolution work better for the people we serve”.
Jack cited a number of areas where the two governments “must work meaningfully together” including on energy, transport and recycling.
He continued: “We can turn from confrontation to collaboration. We know we can achieve much more by working together than by pulling apart.
“These are not just warm words – we have the evidence prove it.”
Here Jack referenced the city deals programme – a project which aims to “grow local economies” and “invest in the future of our communities”.
“As I said the choice the new first minister makes will define them”, he added.
“My advice to them is this, put the people of Scotland first.”
The SNP and Scottish Government have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel