RISHI Sunak has given a top ministerial position in the UK Government to a hereditary peer, for the third time in three months.
Timothy Elliot-Murray-Kynynmound, the “Earl of Minto”, was made a minister in the Department for Business and Trade on Monday.
Elliot-Murray-Kynynmound joined the Lords in October 2022 after coming second in a by-election to replace two Tory hereditary peers who had retired in July. He received 34 votes.
The Tory peer becomes the third hereditary Lord to be brought into Sunak’s government since the beginning of 2023.
READ MORE: Hereditary peer breaks rules to make £57k from his Lords seat
On New Year’s Day, James Younger, termed “Viscount Younger of Leckie”, was handed a role as a minister in the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). His responsibilities include maternity benefits, bereavement benefits, child maintenance, and oversight of departmental business.
And in early March, Jonathan Berry, termed “Fifth Viscount Camrose”, was made a Parliamentary Under Secretary of State in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Tommy Sheppard, an SNP MP and his party’s constitutional affairs spokesperson at Westminster, condemned the appointments.
He told The National: “It is outrageous. Proof, if proof were needed, that the entire house of lords is an edifice of ill repute. It ought to be abolished and has no place in a modern system.
“The Government is just determined to put two fingers up at public opinion, and making a point to [promote] hereditary peers is doing that with bells on.
“How they can go to meetings with international peers knowing they are putting unelected people in charge of major sectors is beyond me. But the Tories know no shame.”
Scottish Green MSP Maggie Chapman also hit out, saying the promotion of hereditary peers to government was an “affront to any understanding of democracy”.
READ MORE: How the world's media reported on Humza Yousaf's SNP election win
She went on: “For it to happen three times is disgraceful. There can be no room in a democratic government for politicians who cannot be removed by the people they are meant to represent and serve.
"The very idea of the House of Lords is not just undemocratic, it is ridiculous. Behind the pageantry and the pomp, some of them hold extremely powerful positions with no form of accountability whatsoever.
"How can it be that we are in the 21st century and people are still being appointed to such a relic of an institution?
"One of the many benefits of Scottish independence would be the opportunity to finally move away from this arcane system and the generations of unelected and unaccountable peers."
There are 92 seats for hereditary peers in the House of Lords, 42 of which are Conservatives. The newest appointment means more than 7% of the Tory hereditary peers are also ministers in the UK Government.
If a Tory hereditary peer dies or resigns his seat, then the other Tory Lords elect a successor from a select list. It was in a by-election such as this that Elliot-Murray-Kynynmound, Berry, and Younger were all elevated to the Lords.
The UK Government said: “Lords ministers are appointed so Parliamentarians in the Second Chamber can hold the UK Government to account. Such scrutiny supports a robust and healthy democracy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel