STEPHEN Flynn has played down the extent of divisions in the SNP following the leadership election.
Humza Yousaf emerged victorious in the contest on Monday, receiving 52.1% of the vote after the second round ahead of Kate Forbes and Ash Regan.
The election was at times branded as bruising for the SNP, with contenders often found questioning each other's competence and policies.
But the party's Westminster leader Flynn said the notion they were divided was not true, particularly over gender reform.
READ MORE: 'I'll clip him round the ear': Humza Yousaf's mum in joke about her son
He told BBC Radio 4: “As I understand it from looking at vote transfers yesterday, I think around two-thirds of the membership cast a vote in favour of both Humza and Kate on transfers.
“So this notion that we are eternally divided is not true and certainly not true over the GRR [Gender Recognition Reform] either.
“It was quite clear there’s differences of opinion but the reality is that the Scottish Parliament through Scottish Labour MSPs, LibDem MSPs, some Conservative MSPs, Green MSPs and Scottish National Party MSPs passed legislation, and the UK Government is now seeking to stand in the way of that.
“That’s a democratic blocker of Scotland.”
After Regan was eliminated in the first round, people who voted for her had their second preferences taken into account.
After the second round, Yousaf had 26,032 votes - up from 24,336 in the first round - while Forbes ended with 23,890 up from 20,559.
The final results mean Regan’s supporters backed Forbes by a majority approaching 2:1. However, the roughly one-third that Yousaf managed to convince represented enough support to get him over 50%.
A total of 1696 of Regan’s backers put Yousaf as their second preference while 3331 of them put Forbes second.
Asked if Yousaf should include Forbes in his Cabinet, Flynn said that “if there is the opportunity to do so”, but added he was “not privy” to the conversations.
He praised the former leadership contender as an “unbelievably talented politician”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel