UNIONISTS have fumed at the appointment of a minister for independence as the Tories branded him a “taxpayer-funded nationalist campaigner”.
Jamie Hepburn was formally voted in as the Scottish Government’s first-ever minister tasked solely with advancing the case for independence – sparking fury among the SNP’s critics.
Douglas Ross said the move showed new First Minister Humza Yousaf was “looking for a fight” with Westminster.
He said: “On Tuesday, in a call with the Prime Minister, he demanded another independence vote, and yesterday he appointed a Minister for independence – a taxpayer-funded nationalist campaigner.
READ MORE: Independence minister speaks for first time on 'exhilarating' new role
“Instead of looking for cooperation between Scotland’s two governments he’s looking for a fight.”
The Scottish LibDems said Hepburn’s appointment exposed the Government as having the wrong priorities, hitting out at Yousaf bundling the mental health, social care and sport briefs into one junior ministerial role in his Cabinet reshuffle.
The party’s leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said: “Just days after declaring that he would be a leader for all of Scotland, Humza Yousaf is appointing a permanent minister to continue agitating for the breakup of the UK at the taxpayers' expense.
"Cramming mental health, social care and sport into a single role is an insult to the thousands awaiting support. Scottish Liberal Democrats want to see a dedicated mental health minister re-instated to tackle the sea of unmet need.
“Instead that time, money and energy will be spent on a minister for stirring up grudge and grievance, rather than dealing with real issues like long NHS waiting lists.”
And a number of unelected peers took aim at the appointment, arguing the Scottish Government was operating outside its powers because the constitution was a reserved matter.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf refuses to apologise for appointing minister for independence at FMQs
Speaking in the Lords, former Tory Scottish secretary, Lord Forsyth of Drumlean, asked: “Surely this is a question of the propriety of the use of public funds and that the Scottish Government are involved in spending public money on a matter for which they have no rights?
“If these people were in local government, they would be being surcharged.”
Treasury minister Baroness Penn responded: “It shows that the Scottish Government’s priorities lie in the wrong place.”
Earlier this year, acting finance secretary John Swinney announced that the remainder of the £20 million planned on preparations for indyref2 would instead go to a fuel poverty fund after the Supreme Court blocked a second vote.
Speaking exclusively with The National after his appointment, Hepburn said he was “exhilarated” to take on the new role and said it was “go time” for independence campaigners.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel