THE majority of SNP voters want the Bute House Agreement with the Greens to continue, according to a new poll.
Research by Panelbase for The Times found 53% of voters backed the cooperation deal, which gives the Greens two junior ministerial posts in Government.
The agreement was one of the main talking points during the SNP leadership contest, given it looked set to end had Kate Forbes or Ash Regan won the hearts of SNP members rather than Humza Yousaf.
The poll also found 35% of voters wanted the agreement to end in favour of the SNP governing through a minority administration, while 12% were unsure whether they wanted the pact to continue.
Yousaf remains committed to the deal and has kept Green co-leaders Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater in his Government.
READ MORE: Passport Office strike starts as staff ‘relying on food banks’
It comes after Fergus Ewing, the former SNP rural affairs secretary, called for the end of the power-sharing agreement and dubbed the Greens “wine bar pseudo-intellectuals”.
He wrote in the Scottish Daily Mail: "We’ve allied ourselves to a small group of fringe extremists that want to dismantle our economy, put hundreds of thousands on the dole and basically close down rural Scotland."
Green MSP Ross Greer said Ewing was "indistinguishable" from the Tories on most issues and "clearly despises" progressive governing.
Across all parties, Panelbase found 33% backed the deal, with 43% opposed and 21% unsure.
Support for Scotland leaving the UK was stable at 46%, with 49% for the Union and 5% don’t knows.
Support for the SNP would fall by four points to 39 per cent at the next General Election, and they would lose 14 MPs, according to the research.
Alba would secure its first two MSPs at the next Holyrood election if the poll proved accurate.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel