A VOTE on banning meat and dairy from catering at Edinburgh University has failed to get enough support to pass.
The proposed motion would have banned meat and dairy from university-run shops and cafes by 2027. However, out of 812 votes at the Student Council meeting, only 19% were in favour of the ban.
Emily Kemp, who forwarded the motion, spoke at the meeting.
In her proposal, she said: “Science indicates that there is a clear need for action in order to tackle the climate crisis. Plant-based catering would be a cost-effective way of meeting its sustainability objectives. Animal farming uses the majority of UK farmland, but contributes to less than 35%, or average calorie intake.”
The meeting then went on to question if enough engagement with the wider 42,000 students had been undertaken to ensure there was support for a meat and dairy ban.
There was also discussions about how the ban could impact different cultures on campus, particularly for the students where a meat-based diet is important.
A number of other students also asked if SRUC students could have been more involved in the motion and if animal welfare had been considered.
After the motion failed to pass, Kemp said: "This is a setback in our strive for climate justice, but not one we will allow to stop us. Going plant-based is a step that must be taken, it is only a shame that it will not happen sooner.
"If Edinburgh's students are so far unconvinced that animal agriculture is wrecking our planet and would rather take the words of those with a vested interest in concealing the truth, then we will continue to work to change that."
In 2020, students at Edinburgh rejected a similar motion to ban meat from campus menus. On that occasion, about 6000 votes were cast and 58% said no to a proposal to impose campus-wide vegetarianism in cafés and restaurants.
In November last year, Stirling became the first Scottish University to impose a plant-based menu.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel