HUMZA Yousaf’s proposal for a new tax band could raise enough money to lift 20,000 children out of poverty, a think tank has said.
The IPPR’s analysis said thousands of families could benefit if the money went towards increasing the Scottish Child Payment.
During the SNP leadership campaign, Yousaf proposed a new tax band for those earning more than £43,662.
The IPPR modelled a similar proposal and found it generated an additional £257 million for the public purse.
READ MORE: Cost of Unionist councils giving workers coronation day off revealed
The think tank said this would be enough to fund increasing the Scottish Child Payment to £40 per week, which could lift 20,000 children out of poverty.
So far 40,000 children are thought to have benefitted from the new social security payment.
IPPR Scotland director, Philip Whyte, said: “Lifting 60,000 children in Scotland out of poverty is not only morally right but it would also ensure Scotland meets its interim child poverty target in the coming year and set a clearer path towards our final targets in 2030.
“But political will, investment and action is needed.
“While we won’t be able to see any change to tax rates until the next budget, this shows what is possible – but it also shouldn’t stand in the way of moving quickly where we can now, including further increases for the Scottish Child Payment.
“The evidence is clear: Going further on progressive taxes in Scotland can loosen the grip of child poverty.
“Humza Yousaf made ambitious proposals to tackle child poverty in his leadership pitch – he must now deliver them in government.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel