PLANS to house asylum seekers on a barge docked off the coast of Dorset have been condemned as "ministerial cruelty".
The UK Government announced that the Bibby Stockholm vessel will hold 500 asylum seekers for at least 18 months on Wednesday afternoon.
Amnesty International blasted the Tories and said it was another sign of ministers trying to "obscure" their "gross mismanagement" of the system.
The Home Office said “basic and functional accommodation” and 24/7 security will be provided on the Bibby Stockholm under plans to reduce the costly reliance on hotels.
The cost of the lease agreement for the vessel that will be docked at Portland Port has not been set out.
Amnesty International UK’s Steve Valdez-Symonds said: “Confining hundreds of people in isolation on a barge is just more of the political theatre that the [UK] Government has created to obscure its gross mismanagement of the asylum system.
READ MORE: King Charles's coronation: How will the Stone of Destiny be protected?
“Along with the disastrous Rwanda scheme, all talk of barges, cruise ships and former military barracks should be abandoned.
“Anyone seeking asylum in this country should be housed in decent accommodation with proper facilities and, crucially, their claims should be properly and consistently processed.”
The Refugee Council added the barge will be “completely inadequate” to house “vulnerable people who have come to our country in search of safety having fled beatings and death threats in countries such as Afghanistan and Iran”.
Tory-run Dorset Council opposed the move and said it had “serious reservations” about Portland Port’s suitability as a location for the barge.
In a statement, the local authority said: “We are aware of the Home Secretary’s announcement this afternoon, confirming the Home Office wishes to proceed with its plans to house asylum seekers in floating accommodation at Portland Port.
“Dorset Council’s position has not changed. We still have serious reservations about the appropriateness of Portland Port in this scenario and we remain opposed to the proposals.
READ MORE: SNP speak on arrest of Peter Murrell as police pictured at HQ
“However, the council will continue to support and acknowledge the concerns of our residents and local businesses.
“There are a number of questions which the Home Secretary’s announcement does not address, we will continue to press the Home Office for answers and await further information.”
Confirming the use of the Bibby Stockholm barge, immigration minister Robert Jenrick said on Wednesday afternoon: “The Home Secretary and I have been clear that the use of expensive hotels to house those making unnecessary and dangerous journeys must stop.
“We will not elevate the interests of illegal migrants over the British people we are elected to serve.
“We have to use alternative accommodation options, as our European neighbours are doing – including the use of barges and ferries to save the British taxpayer money and to prevent the UK [from] becoming a magnet for asylum shoppers in Europe.
“All accommodation will meet our legal obligations and we will work closely with the local community to address their concerns, including through financial support.”
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has defended the use of the barge, insisting it would save taxpayers’ money.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf reacts to news of Peter Murrell's arrest
On a local election campaign trip to Peterborough he said: “I think everybody knows one of my five priorities is to stop the boats, and as part of that, we’ve got to reduce the pressure on hotels in communities up and down the country.
“We are spending, as a country, £6 million a day housing illegal asylum seekers in hotels – that can’t be right.
“I’ve committed to reducing that number, moving asylum seekers out of hotels and that means we need to find alternative sites, including barges like the one we’ve brought forward today.
“That’s going to save the taxpayer money, reduce pressure on hotels and it’s part of our broader plan to stop the boats.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel