A TOP lawyer who was part of the Yes campaign has insisted the arrest of Peter Murrell will not impact of people’s desire for an independent Scotland.
On the BBC’s Newsnight programme, Aamer Anwar said the independence movement “is a dream bigger than any one individual” after being questioned about the potential impact of the former SNP chief executive being arrested at his home on Wednesday in connection with a probe into the party’s finances.
Murrell – husband of Nicola Sturgeon - was released without charge on Wednesday evening “pending further investigation”.
When asked about the knock-on effect the investigation could have on support for the party, Anwar said it would depend on the outcome of the probe which he explained could take several months.
READ MORE: LIVE: Police remain at Peter Murrell and Nicola Sturgeon's home
But when it comes to the wider Yes movement, Anwar stressed the current situation with the SNP does not take away from the fact many Scots still want to cut ties with Westminster.
He told the programme: “The independence cause is not owned by the SNP.
“It doesn’t take away from the fact that today, whatever happens with the fortunes of the SNP, whether this does have an impact or not, people remain sick and tired of being dictated to by Westminster and it [the Yes movement] wasn’t about the SNP.
“It’s not about Nicola, it’s not about Alex, independence for people involved in the Yes movement was about the future of our country, about our children’s future, about a dream that’s bigger than any one individual, about ending poverty, ending of ignorance and equality of opportunity.
“The Independence cause is not owned by any 1 party, nor do today’s events take away from the fact that many are sick of being dictated to by Westminster-It’s not about the SNP, Nicola or Alex, independence is about the future of our country,our children’s future”🏴@BBCNewsnight pic.twitter.com/5Y3xu64PcA
— Aamer Anwar✊🏾🏳️🌈#BlackLivesMatter (@AamerAnwar) April 5, 2023
“Of course, the independence movement grew arms and legs, and of course the SNP was a driving force in that, Alex Salmond was a driving force in that, Nicola Sturgeon was a driving force in that.”
Anwar added that “speculation is unwise” around the investigation and could potentially be in contempt of court.
He said: “As a lawyer I would like to remind everyone of two things - everyone is entitled to a presumption of innocence and proceedings are live so speculation is unwise and potentially in contempt of court.”
READ MORE: Tory MP suspended after offering to lobby ministers for gambling firm
The lawyer refused to speculate on whether the investigation had anything to do with Nicola Sturgeon’s decision to step down as first minister.
A total of 10 officers were stationed outside Sturgeon and Murrell’s home on Wednesday and police were later photographed searching the back garden. Police were still at the Uddingston property as of Thursday morning.
While it was reported yesterday and was a matter of much debate on social media, there remains no evidence that any digging occurred in Murrell and Sturgeon's garden.
Six officers were also filmed entering SNP HQ in Edinburgh on Wednesday and taking out boxes as the force conducted searches “in a number of properties”.
Police Scotland launched a formal investigation into the SNP's finances in July 2021, after receiving complaints about how donations were used.
The probe centres around questions over how more than £600,000 raised for independence campaigning has been spent.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article