LABOUR have released a second “revolting” attack ad despite receiving heavy criticism across the political spectrum for the first.
The party posted the first attack ad claiming that Rishi Sunak does not think child sex abusers should go to prison Thursday afternoon.
The second advert posted to the Labour’s social media channels on Friday afternoon features the same picture of the Prime Minister smiling alongside the words “Do you think an adult convicted of possessing a gun with intent to harm should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn’t.”
It follows on to claim that under the Tories, 937 adults convicted of possession of a firearm with intent to harm served no prison time.
The party then pledges “Labour will lock up dangerous gunmen.”
SNP MP John Nicolson told The National that he had previously stood up for Labour leader Keir Starmer against false claims, but the party “seems to have no such vision” of honesty.
The SNP Shadow Culture Secretary said: “Labour’s new ad campaign is revolting. When Boris Johnson falsely claimed that Keir Starmer had failed to prosecute Savile I stood up for Keir Starmer. I tackled Tory ministers on Johnson’s lies and grotesque tactics.
READ MORE: Labour MSP called ‘transphobic’ over Nike boycott tweet
“I believe that voters want to be inspired by a vision of honest and honourable government. But Labour’s leadership team seems to have no such vision. Their tactic now is to show that they can wallow in a sewer with the Tories. Voters deserve better.”
Political commentator and columnist for the Guardian, Owen Jones, tweeted that both Labour and the Tories are to blame for the tone of the “poisonous” campaign.
He said: “The next election is going to be absolutely disgusting, and both main political parties are to blame.”
The award-winning author known as The Secret Barrister tweeted that Labour had managed to “bungle it again” as there is not an offence entitled of “possession of a firearm with intent to harm”.
Judges and magistrates, rather than the prime minister of the day, are responsible for handing out sentences.
The party was accused of “cheapened and debased” politics and “stooping low” after posting the first advert on Twitter on Thursday.
Following the post, Labour MSPs called the ad campaign “ill-judged”.
The former Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard called for the first ad featuring the Prime Minister to be deleted.
It featured an image of Sunak smiling alongside the words: “Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn’t.”
Campaign group Compassion in Politics condemned Labour’s tactics.
Jennifer Nadel, the organisation’s co-director, said: “This kind of political discourse poisons the water that we all must drink from. It drives up hate and drags down standards.
“Sir Keir Starmer has rightly identified that the public want to see politicians act with respect, dignity, and decency. He can start by pulling this ad from circulation and issuing an immediate apology.”
On Friday morning, a shadow cabinet minister refused to endorse the ad.
Shadow culture secretary Lucy Powell declined to say she stood by the social media message, but insisted it was part of the “cut and thrust” of political debate which sought to highlight the Tories’ record on law and order.
On BBC Breakfast, Powell suggested it was a “skit” based on Sunak’s own promotional material as she declined to say she stood by the tweet.
She said: “What I stand by is what that graphic is trying to show, which is that the Prime Minister of our country is responsible for the criminal justice system of our country and currently that criminal justice system is not working.”
Asked again whether she stood by the message, she said: “I stand by what this tweet and this campaign is trying to highlight.”
She added: “The graphic itself, obviously, is a skit based on his own graphics that he extensively uses.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel