SNP MP Joanna Cherry has said she “cannot understand” why the Scottish Government is taking Westminster to court over its veto of Scotland’s gender legislation.
The Edinburgh South West MP has been an outspoken critic of her own party’s gender legislation and has since reacted to news of a legal challenge.
Writing on Twitter, she said: “I cannot understand why @scotgov is taking legal action it’s unlikely to win rather than sorting out the problems with the #GRRbill at home.
“Reform could be effected in Scotland without breaching #equality or #HumanRights law if there was the will so to do.”
The UK Government has already pledged to “robustly defend” its decision to block the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from becoming law, citing that it would have “an adverse effect on reserved matters, including on the operation of the law as it applies to Great Britain-wide equalities protections”.
I cannot understand why @scotgov is taking legal action it’s unlikely to win rather than sorting out the problems with the #GRRbill at home. Reform could be effected in Scotland without breaching #equality or #HumanRights law if there was the will so to do. https://t.co/omPNfE1Ab9
— Joanna Cherry KC (@joannaccherry) April 12, 2023
Former SNP leadership candidate Ash Regan also disagreed with taking Westminster to court.
She believes that the Scottish Government’s legal challenge over its gender legislation will result in a “humiliating defeat”.
Writing on Twitter, Regan said: “The decision to challenge the Section 35 will result in a humiliating defeat.
“The GRR is deeply unpopular amongst Scottish voters and court action will cost a vast amount of taxpayers money.
The decision to challenge the Section 35 will result in a humiliating defeat. The GRR is deeply unpopular amongst Scottish voters and court action will cost a vast amount of taxpayers money. Losing 30k party members over this policy means it’s time for a re-think.
— Ash Regan MSP (@AshReganSNP) April 13, 2023
“Losing 30k party members over this policy means it’s time for a re-think.”
Meanwhile, the Alba Party have also said that the issue is holding back the push towards independence.
The party’s national women’s convener, Dr Yvonne Ridley, said: “We must be united in our efforts to secure Scotland’s independence, and we must be focused on the needs and aspirations of the Scottish people.
"The First Minister should focus less attention on polarising issues such as gender reforms and more time on issues that can garner the support of the entire population, such as highlighting the absurdity that many people in Scotland live in fuel poverty when we are a land of energy plenty.
"It’s time to start spending less time on self-identification and more time on self-determination."
Yousaf said throughout the course of his leadership that the block was a "undemocratic veto over legislation that was passed by a majority of the Scottish Parliament".
READ MORE: Hope of winning legal challenge over gender reform 'vanishingly small'
Alba also accused Nicola Sturgeon's government of trying to "railroad through an incoherent self-ID policy that is not wanted by the people of Scotland".
"We need a change of focus with the attention of the Scottish Government on issues that matter to the people of Scotland," it said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel