“THINGS are better in Scotland” due to Holyrood’s use of devolved powers over tax and benefits, a leading financial journalist and BBC radio host has said.
Paul Lewis, who presents BBC Radio 4’s Money Box, said in a column for the Radio Times: “I once coined the acronym Tabis – Things Are Better in Scotland – as a shorthand for the forward-looking social policies of that country. And it gets truer all the time.
“Over the past 25 years devolution has given Scotland limited but growing independence over its social security and tax policies. And they are better.
“The Institute for Fiscal Studies reckons the poorest tenth of households in Scotland are £580 a year better off than if they lived in England.”
TABIS! ‘Things are better in Scotland’!! We in @theSNP know this, but nice to see @paullewismoney pointing this out in the @RadioTimes ! Also notes #Labour controlled Wales not using the more limited devolved powers as effectively. #voteSNP pic.twitter.com/YmxCTEDL27
— Ahsan Khan (@AhsanKhanSNP) April 13, 2023
Lewis noted that people who have annual incomes of more than £27,850 will pay more in tax than if they lived elsewhere in the UK, but added: “You get more for that.”
He pointed to free prescriptions, Social Security Scotland listing 13 benefits that are better in Scotland or do not exist at all south of the Border, and disability payments “based on an assessment procedure said to be fairer and more in tune with disabled people”.
However, Lewis said that in Wales the differences were fewer because the devolved government there “has so far not used its powers to change income tax, and it has no powers over social security payments”.
READ MORE: Scottish Government to spend £8.6m to mitigate UK benefits cap
He finished: “Anyone moving from England or Northern Ireland to Scotland or Wales should make sure they are aware of these differences. It could make them better off.”
SNP depute leader Keith Brown commented: "Tabis! Excellent."
Responding to praise from the SNP’s Ahsan Khan, Lewis wrote on Twitter: “I first coined Tabis for my book where so many benefits, tax, law, and education policies I described in it were better than the corresponding ones in the rest of the UK.
“You can find out more and buy the book here: http://bit.ly/3VwITp6.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel