THE Scottish Government’s commitment to building a “wellbeing economy” risks becoming a mere “catchphrase” if it fails to take concrete action, a trade union chief has warned.
Roz Foyer, general secretary of the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), said many phrases used “heavily” by those in power were not backed up by action.
Speaking at the STUC’s conference on Monday, Foyer called on the Scottish Government to “start being bold, being decisive and actually implementing some plans to deliver wealth to the areas that need it most”.
It came after a keynote speech from First Minister Humza Yousaf at the event in Dundee, in which he hailed his government’s record in recent years, including introducing “fair work” rules on £4 billion of public sector investment.
He said: “I’ve made it clear that one of my key priorities as First Minister will be to build that wellbeing economy.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf: 'Sturgeon shouldn't be judged on what happens to her husband'
Speaking at the conference, Foyer told The National: “I have a concern about a lot of these catchphrases […] the wellbeing economy, the fair work agenda, just transition. These are all excellent catchphrases they’re heavily used by those in government.
“What I’m always interested in is: what real difference are we seeing for people on the ground, for ordinary working people, for people that are struggling in our communities right across Scotland?
“And sadly, that is something that we’ve not seen enough of from the Scottish Government. They’ve had many years in power and we need to see some real delivery on the ground.”
Yousaf appointed Neil Gray as the Scottish Government’s first Wellbeing Economy Secretary when he took over as First Minister.
The phrase means an economy where the happiness and health of a population are used as indicators of policy success in the same way economic growth is conventionally.
READ MORE: Former SNP MSP calls on NEC leakers to 'resign now' in furious statement
And she said the STUC “would welcome” discussions with the Scottish Government to “strengthen” the criteria it used to determine the companies with which it does business under “fair work” rules.
Hailing industrial action in Scotland in the past year, which the STUC said resulted in more than £2bn of pay settlements, Foyer urged workers to take “action” when faced with “government inaction”.
She said: “Scotland’s workers over the past year, by standing up and taking action in the face of government inaction, delivered a redistribution of wealth in our economy of over £2bn in the last year and the difference that industrial action made was £1.1bn to those pay deals, so an extra £1.1bn that the bosses and the billionaires and everyone else – the politicians – claimed wasn’t there, was suddenly found when workers stood together and took action.
“So I really need the Scottish Government to start being bold, being decisive and actually implementing some plans to deliver wealth to the areas that need it most.”
Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp, chief executive of Business for Scotland, defended the Scottish Government’s approach to implementing the ideals of a wellbeing economy in practice.
He said: “A few months ago, I might have shared Roz Foyer's concerns about the wellbeing economy becoming a catchphrase but I sense it is far more than that for the new SNP leadership team. I spoke to both Humza Yousaf and Neil Gray, the new Cabinet Secretary for Wellbeing Economy, during the SNP leadership race and can confirm they and the wider SNP leadership team are fully committed to adopting the wellbeing economic approach.
“Humza Yousaf quoted the work done by Scotonomics, the wellbeing economy think tank that spun out of Business for Scotland, in almost every leadership husting event.
“Scotonomics are working flat out to develop a rigorous policy measurement and decision-making evaluation process and meetings are being arranged with ministers and Humza himself to discuss the detail.
“Socialism and capitalism are last century's ideas - Business for Scotland has championed the wellbeing economic approach for many years. It’s not a soundbite, but a new economic approach that solves the problems of this century not the last.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel