A MOTION backing a third referendum option was ditched by trade unions as they pointed out they had not been consulted on details by Gordon Brown’s think tank.
The general council of the STUC told delegates that trade unions should be at the “heart” of the constitutional debate on Scotland’s future.
During the congress, a motion setting out a third option to be included in an independence referendum was due to be debated but was dropped by the proposers to allow the general council to make a statement.
READ MORE: Give Us Space: The National's campaign backing buffer zones
Susan Quinn, told delegates at Cairds Hall in Dundee, that the general council welcomed the sentiment of the motion, put forward initially by Clydebank Trade Union Council, regarding the Our Scottish Futures report released in December last year.
“Workers through their trade unions should be at the heart of the constitution debate on Scotland’s future,” she said.
“Under all constitutional scenarios, including a third option in a referendum, workers' voices must be heard.
“The general council welcomes much of the Labour party’s commission on the future of the UK, including the need for a Scottish parliament to be accorded greater borrowing powers.
“However, we share the concerns expressed in the motion that the commission fails to recognise the role of the public sector in rebalancing the economy, and the renationalisation of basic services and utilities.”
The dropped motion had noted “great concern” over the lack of explicit references to the role of the public sector.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar: Scottish Labour 'expected' on picket lines
Quinn added: “Whilst supporting the sentiments of the motion, the general council must put on record that a number of Labour-affiliated trade unions have informed the general council that they were consulted on the Labour party commission.
“The STUC itself was not.
“General council, therefore, asks for support of this statement in place of amendment motion 111.”
The statement was carried.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel