KEIR Starmer was accused of “working in the shadows against Scottish democracy” as a motion condemning his sacking of Richard Leonard fell at the STUC Congress.
In an interview with The Times earlier this month, the Labour leader said that he had pushed Leonard out of the leadership role in Scottish Labour in February 2021.
Starmer had told senior party colleagues and potential donors that he had no confidence in Leonard’s leadership, and the Scottish leader resigned the next day, just months before the Holyrood election.
In the interview, Starmer had suggested that creating change in his party had required “some pretty ruthless decisions … the Scottish leader was gone two years ago”.
READ MORE: Give Us Space: The National's campaign backing buffer zones
Jim Malone, of the Dundee Trade Union Group, spoke in favour of the motion and accused him of being part of a “shady conspiracy”.
“To remove Richard as the Scottish leader ignoring the interests made at the behest of Scottish Labour members, but also those trade union activists that Richard has supported his whole life and his whole career,” Malone told delegates.
“This was done to serve the interests, no doubt, of the corporate donors who support Starmer. Those on the right, the cabal right-wing MSPs and MPs and also those unelected lords and ladies, who also seem to be in his pocket, those who infect our movement.
“Starmer is the direct opposite of Richard, neither a democrat or a socialist.
“Working in the shadows against Scottish democracy, Starmer has continued with ferocity blocking trade union candidates throughout the country and the UK, many with socialist principles like our comrade Richard Leonard.”
Malone pointed to the deselection of socialist Labour candidate hopefuls, Matt Kerr in Glasgow, and Jeremy Corbyn in Islington.
Richard Hardy, representing the general council by speaking against the motion, said the STUC recognised the “anger” felt by some delegates over Starmer’s remarks.
He said: “However, congress, in the view of the general council, this motion moves it into territory that we have traditionally avoided.
READ MORE: Colin Beattie MSP steps down as SNP treasurer after arrest
“Our movement is made up of a number of major unions that were affiliated to the Labour Party, but also a large number of unique unions, who like my own, are not affiliated.
“The STUC status as non-affiliated to any political party is integral to the role that we play in the wider political debate and in Scottish civic society."
While this hasn’t stopped the STUC from joining in wider political debate and policy positions of parties, Hardy added, the general council were “reluctant” to involve themselves in internal processes, including Leonard’s sacking.
The National asked current Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, who replaced Leonard, if he was embarrassed that the internal party row had made it on to the conference agenda.
“The matters that are debated at congress are for members of congress,” he said.
The full motion read: "That this congress condemns the leader of the UK Labour Party, Keir Starmer MP, for what was widely interpreted as a boast in The Times newspaper on April 4 that he had effectively 'sacked' our friend and comrade and then-Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard MSP.
"Congress offers solidarity to Richard and all trade unionists and socialist Labour members under attack by the current Labour leadership."
It fell with 152 votes in support, and 740 votes opposed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel