THE future of the UK's most important business lobbying group is in peril after a number of high-profile firms cut ties with it amid a sexual misconduct scandal engulfing the organisation.
Some of the biggest companies in the UK have quit the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) following a second rape allegation from a woman working for the business group.
NatWest and Unilever joined the John Lewis Partnership, BMW and Virgin Media O2 in cancelling their involvement with the CBI, casting doubt over the future of the business group.
Aviva, Mastercard, Phoenix, Zurich, Vitality and People’s Partnership also pulled their membership of the group after the latest in a series of misconduct allegations facing the CBI.
Other major employers, such as Asda, Lloyds Banking Group and Shell, have also suspended all activity with the lobbying group.
Earlier this month, the Government said it would pause all engagement with the CBI after initial reports over misconduct at the group.
READ MORE: Scottish island bakery to close 'immediately' after 20 years in business
The crisis facing the trade group deepened after The Guardian reported on Friday that the woman claimed she was raped by two male colleagues.
The woman claimed the alleged rape took place while she was unconscious following a night-out while working at a CBI office abroad.
She said she had no recollection of the rape itself but had described in detail the physical signs that led her to believe she was raped, and was later presented in the office with an explicit photograph.
It is the second claim from a woman that she was a victim of rape at the organisation.
Previously, a member of staff alleged that she was attacked by a manager on a summer boat party in 2019.
Details of the new rape allegation have been passed on to police.
City of London Police were already investigating the previous rape allegation, alongside a series of other misconduct claims from about a dozen workers.
Separately, The Guardian also reported on Friday that a woman based at the organisation’s London office claimed she was stalked by a male colleague in 2018.
In response, CBI president Brian McBride said: “The latest allegations put to us by The Guardian are abhorrent and our hearts go out to any women who have been victims of the behaviour described.
READ MORE: Five things to remember amid the police probe into SNP finances
“While the CBI was not previously aware of the most serious allegations, it is vital that they are thoroughly investigated now and we are liaising closely with the police to help ensure any perpetrators are brought to justice.
“We recognise the substance of the harassment report outlined as relating to an allegation made and investigated in January 2018.
“The finding of harassment was upheld and a sanction was imposed.
“However, the CBI does not recognise many of the most serious elements of The Guardian story relating to harassment, including the assertion that the individual had told the CBI of feelings of a sexual and violent nature towards the victim; and that he had followed her home.”
The CBI added it is expecting a further report from lawyers conducting an internal investigation later on Friday and will announce steps to “bring about the wider change that is needed” early next week.
On Thursday, the CBI confirmed it passed fresh information to the police regarding a report of a “serious criminal offence”.
It said it was “liaising closely” with the authorities and has urged anyone with further information to come forward.
Separately, former CBI director-general Tony Danker was sacked last week after being accused of making unwanted contact with a woman who works for the organisation.
On Wednesday, he said his reputation has been “totally destroyed” by the allegation and claimed he has been made a “fall guy” for a wider crisis.
Danker told the BBC his name had been wrongly associated with separate claims, including the rapes which were alleged to have happened before he joined the CBI.
After initial allegations, the business group also suspended three other employees and hired a law firm, Fox Williams, to carry out an internal investigation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel