POLITICIANS from across the world – including the former Italian prime minister – have united to condemn the UK Government’s draconian anti-strike laws.
In a joint statement signed by 121 politicians from 18 countries, the UK Government was told to abandon its plans to limit the right to strike in Britain by introducing minimum levels of service.
It would mean employers would be able to demand staff show up for work even if their union was on strike to maintain services at a level set by the state.
The Trades Union Congress (TUC) issued a statement signed by politicians from socialist, leftist and green parties across the world, including Giuseppe Conte, the former prime minister of Italy.
The letter was signed by parliamentarians in countries such as Ireland, France, Germany, Australia and Sweden among others.
READ MORE: Union bosses urge Scottish politicians to fight 'draconian' Tory anti-strike bill
British trade unionists already operate within some of the “draconian restrictions […] anywhere in the democratic world”, the letter said, adding the Government’s plans would further roll back “worker protections and freedoms”.
The letter reads: “As elected politicians from around the world, we, the undersigned, reject the UK government’s attempt to limit workers’ rights and its attempt to justify it with comparisons to international norms.
“The UK already has some of the most draconian restrictions on trade unions anywhere in the democratic world and workers in the UK are faced with disproportionate regulatory hurdles before participation in a strike can be considered legal.
“Despite this, the UK government is set on further rolling back worker protections and freedoms.
“The government’s proposed legislation, the ‘Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill’, is attempting to bring in new top-down powers which would allow them to impose an arbitrary level of service on a broad range of sectors.
“These new powers will allow the government to force union members to go into work on strike days under threat of dismissal.”
The SNP described the letter as a “damning verdict” on the UK Government and highlighted First Minister Humza Yousaf’s commitment at the Scottish Trades Union Congress’s conference earlier this month that the Scottish Government would not enforce the law.
READ MORE: Minimum wage rise 'doesn't reflect real cost of living', Scottish Government says
Chris Stephens, the MP for Glasgow South West, said: “This is a damning verdict on the Tories and their abhorrent anti-strike legislation which punishes workers for going on strike and taking action over poor working conditions and pay.
“Ever since Brexit, the UK’s standing in the world continues to decline and this is another nail in the coffin of the UK’s power and influence on the international stage. The UK government has been completely humiliated by their allies.
“This also blows a massive hole in the Tories’ argument that this awful piece of legislation merely aligns the UK with other nations such as France and Germany. These countries have now come out and completely rubbished that claim, calling the restrictions draconian.
“I was pleased to hear the First Minister last week condemn this legislation and that it would not be enforced by the Scottish Government.
“It is another demonstration for the people of Scotland of the tale of two governments, one at Holyrood that supports the right to strike and the one at Westminster that wants to see you sacked for exercising your basic rights.
“That is why the only way to protect workers' rights, just like our European neighbours do, is for Scotland to escape Westminster control and become an independent country.”
The bill is currently under scrutiny in the House of Lords and is expected to be debated again in the upper chamber on Wednesday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel