THE family of imprisoned Dumbarton man Jagtar Singh Johal say they fear he could be stuck in arbitrary detention for 40 years due to delays in the Indian justice system.
Speaking as campaigners mark 2000 days since the 36-year-old’s arrest in India, Johal’s brother Gurpreet Singh Johal said he could be in his 70s by the time the trial is completed, based on current timescales.
Johal, who is known as Jaggi, was arrested in India following his wedding in 2017, accused of helping to fund a Sikh-on-Hindu assassination plot – something he and his family strongly deny.
An investigation by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention determined there was no legal basis for his detention.
READ MORE: SNP's last-ditch bid to scrutinise immigration crackdown bill rejected
The group cited multiple violations of his human rights – including claims he was tortured into signing a “false confession” through electric shocks to his ear lobes, nipples and genitals.
The family’s MP, Martin Docherty-Hughes, has been leading a cross-party campaign pressing the Prime Minister to intervene in the case.
Criticism has been levelled at the UK Government for failing to secure Johal’s release, amidst claims ministers are prioritising a trade deal with India.
Docherty-Hughes said: “As we mark the 2000th day of Jagtar’s imprisonment, the UK Government has massive questions to answer on why it’s going soft on the case when this UK citizen needs them the most.
“Their recent submissions stating that they didn’t believe Jagtar to have been tortured was a slap in the face for his family, who they have strung along for these five and a half years.
“Promises of ‘extreme action’ by Tory Ministers have been unfulfilled and their representations have been weak and predictable.
“As the UN report clearly stated, Jagtar has been arbitrarily detained – yet the UK and Indian governments remain seemingly the only two actors in the case unable to acknowledge this fact.
“It’s appalling that while Ministers prioritise a trade deal, my constituent is left languishing in prison with no resolution in sight.”
A Foreign Office spokesperson said: “We have consistently raised our concerns about Mr Johal’s case directly with the Government of India, including his allegations of torture and his right to a fair trial – we are committed to doing what we can to assist him.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here