SCOTTISH Greens councillors in Scotland’s capital have said the Duke of Edinburgh’s title should not be officially recognised by the city.
In March, the King officially handed his late father’s title to his brother Prince Edward in celebration of his 59th birthday.
Now, co-conveners of the Scottish Greens group on the City of Edinburgh Council Alys Mumford and Ben Parker have submitted a motion rejecting the title.
What motivated this motion?
Speaking to The National, Mumford, who serves as the councillor for Portobello/Craigmillar, said it was “right” to question the links between the monarchy and Scotland’s capital.
“We’ve been asking lots of questions over the past year about the costs of things like Operation Unicorn, plans around the coronation and saying it’s not the default that we’re supportive of the monarchy”, she said.
This comes after a recent survey showed that apathy towards the royal family and the coronation is only increasing, with three-quarters of Scots showing little care towards either.
Mumford continued: “An increasing number of people are being alienated.
"We know that it doesn’t feel to people like something that matters amid the cost of living crisis to see this sort of pageantry and then to see that our city has been gifted as a birthday present to someone.
“It’s absolutely right we should question how that happened. It shows a democratic deficit, it’s a symbol of inherited wealth and power that goes against everything we claim to believe in as a city.
SIGN THE PETITION TO HAVE ANDREW STRIPPED OF HIS TITLE HERE
“It’s being imposed on us and we have a right to say we don’t recognise it.”
What does the motion call for?
The motion, shared with The National, says that the “titles should not exist” and that “the only legitimate representation of the people of Edinburgh is that which is democratic and accountable to them”.
It adds that Edward Windsor should have “no official standing” in any event which is hosted by the council, “nor any special privileges or access to Council property regarding events for the city or its people”.
What’s the feeling towards the coronation?
The King’s coronation is set to take place on May 6 with a rally scheduled to take place at Calton Hill calling for a republic.
On Thursday, it was revealed that Charles is a direct descendant of somebody who benefited from slave plantations.
Mumford continued: “I would say being associated with the monarchy is not something we want to do as a city.
“We don’t think this title should exist, it shouldn’t be gifted. We can’t say don’t take our name in vain but we can say it holds no official status in the city and that there should be no special privileges for them.
“Our job as democratic councillors is to represent everyone and there is a growing voice of republicanism uncomfortable with this and we’ve brought this to speak for these people.
“You’re not alone, you’re not going mad, it is weird what’s happening so that’s why we’ve brought it.”
Prince Andrew petition
The National recently sent one of our reporters to Inverness to discover what the locals made of Prince Andrew’s Earl of Inverness title.
They told us he had brought the city into “disrepute” and we have since launched a petition calling for the Duke to be stripped of his title.
Some good vox poppery here. https://t.co/A9VGwBJMMb
— ALASTAIR CAMPBELL (@campbellclaret) April 27, 2023
It now has almost 3500 signatures. Mumford believes that the sentiments expressed in Inverness point to a wider rejection of the monarchy.
“Imagine if Charles had given the Duke of Edinburgh title to Andrew. I think there would be mass outrage and I think what’s happening in Inverness is another reason why Edinburgh should be rejecting this”, she said.
SIGN THE PETITION TO HAVE ANDREW STRIPPED OF HIS TITLE HERE
“Even if people won’t come to the top of Calton Hill, they are questioning this and we’ve seen huge amounts of media coverage looking at the toxic culture within the Royal Family.
“There is a significant number of people saying ‘this is fine’ but why are we changing our lives for it, why are we paying money into the city for it when we have our own Edinburgh-related issues to think and talk about.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel