MICHAEL Gove has predicted an SNP "rebrand" amid an acceptance that independence is not yet the settled will of the majority.
The Levelling Up Secretary told party members at the Scottish Conservative conference that Humza Yousaf's party would look to redefine itself as "Scotland's party", fighting for its resources and people.
He told journalists after the Conservative Friends of the Union fringe event that such a move did not "frighten" him.
“The SNP will change its approach for the moment,” Gove said.
“They have a base that of course they need to keep riled up and believing that independence was just over the horizon.”
He went on: “They know that they’ve over-reached and therefore, I suspect, what they will do is they will rebrand themselves as Scotland’s party, fighting for more resources at Westminster and fighting to ensure that they deliver domestically in tune with Scottish values more broadly.”
Gove's comments come after Sir Tom Devine, Scotland's pre-eminent historian, said that the cause of Scottish independence is “virtually dead for at least a generation” amid turmoil in the SNP.
Asked after the event if the security of the Union being less significant could hurt his party – which pitches itself as the key defender of the UK – at the ballot box, Gove said: “No, I’m not frightened.
“I think it’s a recognition of reality, that the case for independence has been compromised by the failures of the Scottish Government and I think that the majority of people in Scotland want their politicians to concentrate on public service delivery and improving the economy.
READ MORE: Labour members in 'official complaint' to party amid row over Rutherglen by-election
“I think that is a good thing, the more we’re talking about how we make people’s lives better on a day-to-day basis and the less we’re rambling about the constitution, the better overall.”
His comments come after a BBC report, quoting party sources, said the SNP was focusing on increasing support for independence before pushing for another vote.
Gove also praised one of the SNP’s leading internal critics, MSP Fergus Ewing, and former leadership candidate Kate Forbes.
Admitting he probably wasn't doing him any favours, Gove said he had a “soft spot” for Ewing (below), who has been vocal in his opposition of a number of recent Scottish Government policies and particularly critical of the alliance with the Scottish Greens.
He praised Forbes for agreeing to the UK Government's proposals for freeports in Scotland during her time as finance secretary.
He was less kind about the rest of the SNP, as he waded into the turmoil engulfing the party over its finances.
The SNP’s auditors resigned in October, with the job still vacant six months later, but Gove offered his own assessment of the party, joking: “The SNP are having trouble finding auditors to sign off their accounts, so I thought I’d save them the trouble.
“They’ve run out of ideas, they’ve got no credibility left – a bankrupt party running a broken government. And that audit comes for free.”
READ MORE: Pat Kane: As we wait for independence progress, let's put our focus on small projects
Responding, SNP MP David Linden said: “The SNP won a mandate for an independence referendum at the Scottish Parliament election, with a record number of votes, and we will continue to press for Scottish democracy to be respected and for people in Scotland to have a choice over our future.
“At the General Election next year, voting SNP is the best way to beat the Tories in Scotland and the only way to get rid of Westminster Tory governments for good with independence.
“If enough people vote SNP, Scotland could hold the balance of power at Westminster.
“A strong SNP team of MPs would block the Tories from government and extract the best deal for Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel