KING Charles’s coronation service has been discretely tweaked so that Prince Andrew will not have to play a key role.
The ceremony, which will be held on May 6, would previously have seen “Homages of Royal Blood”. This would have seen dukes of the royal line, such as Andrew, Prince Harry and William, kneel before the monarch in turn and each vow to be his “liege man”.
But as part of changes to the coronation ceremony, the royal blood homages have been slimmed down so that Andrew – the Duke of York – will not have to take centre stage.
Instead, only the Prince of Wales, William, will perform the homage.
READ MORE: Inverness locals on why they want Prince Andrew stripped of ‘earl’ title
William will kneel before the monarch, place his hands between Charles’s, and say: “I, William, Prince of Wales, pledge my loyalty to you and faith and truth I will bear unto you, as your liege man of life and limb. So help me God.”
The changes to the ceremony have been made in close consultation with Buckingham Palace and the UK Government.
The removal of Andrew’s role from the occasion comes as The National runs a petition aimed at seeing him stripped of his “Earl of Inverness” title, which locals say has brought their city into “disrepute”.
The coronation would also previously have been a “Homage of Peers”, which would have involved a long line of hereditary aristocrats kneel and make a pledge to the monarch in person.
But this has been stripped out of Charles’s coronation ceremony, replaced by a “Homage of the People”. This will see millions of people across the UK and wider Commonwealth asked to give a “great cry” of allegiance to the King.
Lambeth Palace, the office of the Archbishop of Canterbury, said in a statement: “The Homage of the People is particularly exciting because that’s brand new.
“That’s something that we can share in because of technological advances, so not just the people in the abbey, but people who are online, on television, who are listening, and who are gathered in parks, at big screens and churches.
“Our hope is at that point, when the Archbishop invites people to join in, that people wherever they are, if they’re watching at home on their own, watching the telly, will say it out loud – this sense of a great cry around the nation and around the world of support for the King.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel