LABOUR have been accused of having a “Nick Clegg moment” after appearing to U-turn on free tuition for university students.
Stephen Flynn, the SNP’s Westminster leader, pointed out at Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday that his party are now the only major group in the Commons to support the abolition of tuition fees – after Keir Starmer said it was time for Labour to “move on” from the policy.
The Aberdeen MP drew a comparison between Starmer and former LibDems leader Clegg, whose reversal on the policy as part of the 2010 Conservative coalition deal played a large part in the collapse of his party’s vote share at the following election.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar at odds with Keir Starmer over free university tuition policy
Flynn asked: “For the avoidance of any doubt, the Liberal Democrats don’t believe in abolishing tuition fees, the Conservatives don’t believe in abolishing tuition fees and of course, the Labour Party now with their own Nick Clegg moment, don’t believe in abolishing tuition fees either.”
🗣️ 'The Labour Party now with their own Nick Clegg moment don't believe in abolishing tuition fees'
— The National (@ScotNational) May 3, 2023
MPs jeer as @StephenFlynnSNP opens with a punchy question at PMQs pic.twitter.com/0oJf0LrT1b
He added: “Is it not the case that the main Westminster don’t offer young people any hope at all?”
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak replied with a disputed claim about the number of English students who come from deprived backgrounds versus their Scottish counterparts.
The independent fact-checking service Full Fact has previously said this comparison is “tricky” because the quality of data on this measure is better in England than it is in Scotland, and many more Scots from deprived backgrounds gain a higher education in colleges rather than universities – a factor they said was not reflected in the figures.
Sunak said: “I’d gently point out to the honourable gentleman, that if you’re from a disadvantaged background you’re far more likely to go to university in England than you are in Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel