THE National’s petition to strip Prince Andrew of his Scottish title is closing in on 5000 signatures.
We previously told how Inverness locals felt the Earl of Inverness had brought their city into “disrepute” with one saying he was “not fit for man nor beast” and another adding that he had a “serious attitude problem”.
Buckingham Palace has confirmed that Andrew will have no formal role in the coronation.
The National started a petition to strip the Duke of York of his Scottish title and it has received backing from the likes of Jeremy Vine and Alastair Campbell.
It currently has just short of 4900 signatures.
🗣 Locals have told The National why they back a petition to have Prince Andrew stripped of his 'Earl of Inverness' title pic.twitter.com/lWwVXtZcTv
— The National (@ScotNational) April 24, 2023
Upon the launch of the petition, Tommy Sheppard, an SNP MP and his party’s constitution spokesperson at Westminster told The National: “Prince Andrew’s reputation is toast. To think that he continues to claim lordship over Inverness is an utter disgrace.
“But of course, the entire feudal concept of royalty and inherited titles has no place in a modern democratic society. It perpetuates inequality and reinforces a hierarchical class system of a bygone era.
SIGN THE PETITION TO STRIP ANDREW OF HIS TITLE HERE
“Let’s start a precedent for stripping all of them of unearned titles and elevated status, beginning with Andrew.”
A poll conducted by Find out Now for The National earlier this year found that just 7% of Scots believed Andrew should be allowed to keep the title.
A spokesperson for Our Republic, who will hold a rally in Edinburgh later today, said Andrew retaining the title was “an open display of contempt” for the people of Inverness.
READ MORE: This coronation shows we may have finally reached peak royal
“Andrew’s continued claim to Inverness, a city he has no connection to other than as another title to bolster his ego and sense of status, is an open display of contempt for the people who call the city home and for democracy.
“This practice of awarding cities via titles as gifts between an out of touch and corrupt aristocracy should be put behind us, let Andrew be the first of many to go”, they said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here