LAWYERS in Aberdeen will join the boycott of Scottish Government plans to hold a pilot of juryless rape trials, according to reports.
The plans have proven controversial, with lawyers in Glasgow and Edinburgh saying they will refuse to take part in the pilot, which was proposed as part of a sweeping Justice Reform Bill earlier this month.
The Justice Secretary Angela Constance has insisted there is a “legitimate and pressing" case to move forward with a pilot of judge-only rape trials amid the boycott threat.
Among the voices against the changes was former senior judge Lord Uist, who described the plans as “constitutionally repugnant”, accusing ministers of “treating the courts as forensic laboratories in which to experiment with their policies”.
Speaking to The Herald, Aberdeen Bar Association vice president Ian Woodward-Nutt accused the Scottish Government of attempting to “engineer” higher conviction rates in such cases.
READ MORE: Lawyers threaten to boycott pilot of judge-only rape trials
He said: “It is essential to understand that in many rape cases it is hard for the prosecution to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt.
“That is not due to some deficiency in the system that requires to be rectified, rather it is the inevitable consequence of the background circumstances in cases of this type.
“For the Government to consider it appropriate to attempt to engineer higher conviction rates and for them to try to do so by removing the essential safeguard of trial before a jury is deeply troubling.
“That is why defence lawyers in Aberdeen and the north-east of Scotland have declared they will not accept instructions in cases proceeding by way of this experimental scheme.”
READ MORE: Justice Secretary responds to boycott threat for judge-only rape trial pilot
The change was proposed by another senior judge, Lady Dorrian, in a review that informed the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, with the Justice Secretary claiming low conviction rates for rape and attempted rape were hampered by the “prevalence of preconceptions”.
In the most recent figures, conviction rates for rape and attempted rape were 51%, compared with 91% for all other crimes.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel