AN ex-Labour MSP has said David Lammy is “living in cloud cuckoo land” if he thinks not repealing anti-protest legislation rushed through by the Tories will win Labour an election.
Neil Findlay, who was a Labour MSP for 10 years, has blasted his party after Lammy said they would not reverse the Public Order Bill if they were to form a government after the next General Election.
Ex-Labour member and current SNP MP Tommy Sheppard has also criticised the move, saying it shows a party that was once about reform and change has now become “the mass party of the establishment”.
Current Labour MSP Monica Lennon encouraged party members to make their voices heard on the issue, as she insisted the way to win an election was “by being bold and progressive”.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak to face no confidence vote in Commons
What is the Public Order Bill?
The bill, which was rushed through Westminster ahead of the King’s coronation but does not apply to Scotland, will include a 12-month prison sentence for protesters who block roads and a six-month jail term or unlimited fine for anyone who locks on to others, a building, or an object. Police are also permitted to stop protesters they suspect are out to cause “disruption”.
📢What is the Public Order Bill and why won't Labour repeal it?📢
— The National (@ScotNational) May 8, 2023
Our political reporter @xanderescribe explains this anti-protest legislation (which doesn't apply to Scotland), the UN's position and Labour's strange stance on it all. pic.twitter.com/MakfVTBmLd
Lammy, the party’s foreign office spokesperson, told LBC it would take up “too much parliamentary time” to repeal the law and Labour can’t come into office “picking through all the Conservative legislation and repealing it”.
His comments have sparked uproar with voters wondering why they should put an X next to a Labour candidate if the party is going to leave damaging Tory policies in place.
Reaction in Scotland
Findlay said the right to protest is an “intrinsic part of any democratic society” and insisted it would be daft for any Labour government to suggest they won’t go back on it.
He told The National: “David Lammy’s comments were woeful. Lammy should read the history of the party he is a leading member of.
“The right to protest is an intrinsic part of any democratic society and has been exercised by socialists, trade unionists and campaign groups for hundreds of years.
“To say an incoming Labour Government wouldn’t unpick the worst Tory legislation is frankly daft.
“It is the duty of any incoming government to get rid of the rubbish passed by its predecessor. If this the approach he thinks will win an election - he is living in cloud cuckoo land.”
Findlay has been highly critical of his party in recent years having previously slammed a “poisonous” culture among Labour MSPs with their “hard Unionist” agenda.
Lennon, who has been a Labour MSP since 2016, said her party should be offering a progressive agenda in order to achieve a comfortable majority and encouraged members to make their voices heard if they are unhappy with Lammy’s stance.
She said: “There is a process for deciding the Labour manifesto for the next election and party members should make their voices heard.
“Many people will rightly expect a Labour government to act differently from the Tories who have curtailed the right to protest and the right to strike.
“It is through offering bold and progressive change that Labour will attract support and achieve the comfortable majority needed to govern with confidence.”
Over the weekend, dozens of people were arrested for protesting against the King’s crowning including Graham Smith, the chief executive of anti-monarchy group Republic.
Sheppard, who was assistant general secretary of Scottish Labour under John Smith, said Labour could easily “snatch defeat from the jaws of victory” if they continue with their “lack of ambition”.
READ MORE: Scottish Government challenged to give date for end of oil and gas use
He told The National: “I think it’s sad really that a party that was founded as a great mass party of reform and change has become the mass party of the establishment.
“This is further evidence that the lack of ambition in the Labour party to change anything is deeply uninspiring and a fragile edifice on which to build a campaign for government.
“The only reason Labour are ahead in the polls is because people want change and if Labour keep saying they are not going to change anything, they could easily snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel