AN SNP MP has called for a debate on the “thought police” in response to the Tories’ new anti-protest laws which resulted in the arrest of republican protesters at the coronation.
Deirdre Brock, the SNP’s shadow Commons leader, took aim at the Government during business questions on Thursday over the Public Order Act – which gives police sweeping powers to crack down on protests, even before they have begun.
The MP compared it to the sinister law enforcement portrayed in George Orwell’s 1984 novel, after members of the anti-monarchy group Republic and others were arrested on Saturday during the King’s coronation.
The Metropolitan Police subsequently released Republic members and said the arrests were regrettable.
READ MORE: Republic crowdfunder skyrockets and set to reach £100k following coronation arrests
Teasing Mordaunt for her “commendable upper body strength” on Saturday – in which the Leader of the House was required to carry a nearly 4ft-long sword for upwards of an hour, Brock asked: “Did the Leader’s somewhat authoritarian look on Saturday reflect the new and unnerving Braverman law which apparently allows for arresting people even for thinking about protesting.
“So can we have a debate on the thought police and on whether guidance for that hastily-delivered Act might be tightened up after those recent unfortunate arrests.”
Mordaunt replied: “She raises the issue of protests and I would just say to all members of this house, we make the laws in this place and we have brought in new measures because we felt that the public need protection from particularly disruptive and dangerous protests as we’ve seen in recent events and developments.
“But the police are operationally independent. They need to use their judgment, sometimes they will make mistakes and when they do, as we have seen, they apologise for them. And I think all of that is incredibly reassuring.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel