THE UK Government is “running scared” of a second independence referendum because not one of the arguments the pro-Union side made in 2014 still holds up, Alex Salmond will tell the Alba conference.
The former first minister will point to key Better Together arguments from nine years ago during an address to Alba delegates in Inverness on Saturday.
Arguments such as how voting No would protect Scotland’s EU membership and prevent grocery and energy bills from skyrocketing will be highlighted in Salmond’s speech.
He is expected to say: “The Tory Party have junked every commitment they made in the 2014 referendum – they have destroyed their own case for the Union while Labour offer less of the same.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond: Pro-independence parties should unite under one banner
“In 2014 they told us that we would be safe in Europe. Now we are out of the single market and every household in Scotland is paying the price – the Danegeld of Brexit.
“In 2014 they told us we would be safe in Sterling. Now Sterling is kept afloat by sky high interest rates and every household in Scotland is paying the price – the Danegeld of Sterling.
“In 2014 they told us that staying in the UK would mean lower energy bills – falling by £50. Now every household in Scotland is paying thousands extra – the Danegeld of higher heating bills.”
“The Tories have not just wrecked the economy – they have wrecked their own economic case for the Union along with it.”
Salmond will add: “The No campaign in 2014 sneaked home on a false prospectus. Tory and Labour – the Better Together coalition – conned Scotland out of independence.”
In a detailed list accompanying the trailed speech, Alba have provided receipts for the promises made by the No campaign and pro-Union politicians in 2014.
In a report called “Scotland analysis: Energy”, published by the Tory government in April 2014, it stated: “The UK Government has set aside £1 billion for the development of projects in its [Carbon Capture and Storage] Commercialisation Programme and is making £100 million available now to the Peterhead project in Aberdeen … “In the event of a vote for Scottish independence, under the competition criteria, it is unlikely Peterhead would be eligible for further funding from the £1 billion available.”
But in November 2015, the entire £1bn pot was scrapped.
READ MORE: Are Scottish missiles fuelling 'forever war' in Ukraine, asks MacAskill
The party also quoted a report from November 2014 where the UK Government estimated that the cost of energy bills would have fallen by around £50 by 2020, from £1369 to £1319.
Instead, energy watchdog Ofgem’s price cap is currently at £3280 for a dual-fuel household paying by direct debit, based on typical consumption.
Elsewhere, a Better Together leaflet compared the cost of groceries in a Tesco in Ireland against the same items in a British Tesco, concluding that it was “16% higher” outside of the UK.
Alba highlighted how grocery price inflation was at 17.5% over the four weeks to March 19, 2023.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel