THE Alba Party have claimed they have more members than the Scottish Conservatives and Scottish LibDems.
In her opening remarks to members gathered at Eden Court in Inverness for the party’s conference, Alba’s chair Tasmina Ahmed Sheikh said the party was approaching a membership number of 7500.
She added that over 1000 new members have joined in the year to date.
Scottish Labour, the Scottish Conservatives and the Scottish LibDems all failed to say how many members they had when previously approached by The National.
In 2011, when Ruth Davidson was elected as leader of the Scottish Tories had around 5600 members – a figure she claimed increased by 2000 the following year.
Sheikh told members: “I’m delighted to announce that our membership is now approaching 7500 with well over 1000 members joining since the turn of the year.
“That means we have overtaken both the Liberal Democrats and the Tories, and are now setting our sights on Labour’s branch office.
“It also means of course that we are fast closing in on the Greens and I’m confident that by autumn conference, we will have become Scotland’s second biggest independence party.
“What is most important about this, is that we are a party of activists. Experienced and committed activists. Independence activists. We are all first activists in Alba.
“That means that every new member of Alba means another activist for our national cause. That and only that, should be our driving force.”
READ MORE: Alba Party says they have more members than Scottish Tories or LibDems
The Scottish Greens previously told The National they have 7646 members as of late April while the SNP previously announced their membership numbers stood at 74,889 – up from the 72,186 reported at the beginning of March.
The SNP was at the centre of a transparency row during the leadership contest after its former head of communications quit claiming he had been given inaccurate data when fielding questions from the media.
The National has approached both the Scottish Conservatives and Scottish LibDems for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel