JACOB Rees-Mogg has been urged to explain his bizarre comparison between Rishi Sunak and the Borgias – a noble Italian house known for treachery.
In a previous interview with the BBC, Rees-Mogg said it was “no good being holier-than-thou if you end up behaving like a Borgia”.
The House of Borgia, which produced two Popes, was a wealthy aristocratic family during the Italian renaissance and some members became known for their treachery.
In an exchange on Sky News, Sophy Ridge said Rees-Mogg was “being a bit bashful” in explaining his comparison.
#Ridge - You have referenced the Borgias... what did they do?
— Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) May 14, 2023
Jacob Rees-Mogg - I'll give people a history lesson on GBnews... #Ridge - So you're effectively saying corrupt ... is that what you're saying about Rishi Sunak? #bbclaurak pic.twitter.com/GKUbom7qha
“Everyone knows about the Borgias”, replied the Tory MP – a claim which seemingly left the Sky News presenter bemused.
He added: “I’m not here to give you a history lecture. I’m happy with the reference but if people want history lectures I’ll give them on GB News between eight and nine o’clock every Monday to Thursday.”
The comment left Ridge laughing but she continued to press Rees-Mogg on what exactly the Borgias did.
He replied by giving a bit of detail about the family but refused to be drawn on the specifics of his comparison.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer claims on Labour-SNP deal 'a matter of tactics'
Ridge added: “So corrupt effectively, is that what you’re really referencing to Rishi Sunak?”
Rees-Mogg added: “No I think you’re delving into this far too much. No I don’t think he’s corrupt but I think he broke a promise. That was the point.”
The GB News presenter previously accused the Prime Minister of breaking is word over the decision not to scrap thousands of EU laws by the end of the year.
The MP is among those backers of the Conservative Democratic Organisation (CDO) which was officially launched on Friday.
Among the keynote speakers was Priti Patel who blamed the “centre” of the Conservative Party for their bruising results in last week’s local elections.
Set up by supporters of Boris Johnson, the group wants to give party members more power and is critical of the way in which Rishi Sunak was appointed leader.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel