HUMZA Yousaf has “fundamentally” rejected claims his predecessor failed to improve the lives of children.
The First Minister said his Government’s defining mission is to reduce child poverty – amid concerns from Scotland’s outgoing Children and Young People’s Commissioner that “action isn’t following the words”.
Bruce Adamson took aim at the efforts of the previous administration – led by Nicola Sturgeon – to reduce the education-related attainment gap and alleviate child poverty.
The former first minister had said she wanted to be judged on education during her tenure.
READ MORE: Child poverty rates in Scotland lower than UK-wide, data shows
On Monday, Yousaf jumped to the defence of Sturgeon after Adamson said she had “absolutely” failed on the task.
Speaking during a visit to the NHS 24 contact centre in Dundee, Yousaf said: “I have the greatest of respect for the outgoing children’s commissioner, but I fundamentally disagree with Bruce Adamson about what he said about my predecessor or indeed what he is saying on the Scottish Government.”
He said “game-changing” policies like the Scottish Child Payment, free bus travel for under-22s, and free school meals had been a defining legacy of Sturgeon’s administration.
But looking to his own policies, he said: “I am the first to accept that more has to be done to reduce our child poverty rates in Scotland, which are too high.
“And that’s why I’ve made it a defining mission of the Government that I lead.”
Adamson, speaking on BBC Scotland’s Sunday Show, said Yousaf “may have made some big promises before becoming First Minister, but we’ve not seen anything on delivering those.”
He also raised concerns about the lack of movement on incorporating the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) into Scots Law.
A bill was unanimously passed by MSPs nearly two years ago but it was deemed by the UK Supreme Court to have overstepped the bounds of Holyrood and was struck down.
Now, Yousaf has committed to putting “pace behind” working with the UK Government on reintroducing the bill – but he stressed the importance of not raising the bill again in Holyrood until ministers were sure it would not be blocked.
READ MORE: How will currency arrangements work in an independent Scotland?
He said: “I think part of his concern, of course, was that we haven’t made enough or sufficient progress in relation to the incorporation of the UNCRC, I think that’s fair criticism.”
He added: “Now we have to work with the UK Government when it comes to the re-introduction of that bill. What I don’t want to do is reintroduce a bill and there’s another referral, for example, to the Supreme Court.
“We are working with the UK Government and I’m going to put some pace behind that to make sure we can reintroduce that bill sooner rather than later.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel