A "STRATEGIC approach” to dealing with rising accommodation costs in Edinburgh is needed, the boss of the world famous Edinburgh Festival Fringe has insisted, branding soaring bills in the capital as being the “grim reaper”.
Shona McCarthy, the chief executive of the Edinburgh Festival Fringe Society, complained about the “dreaded rising cost of accommodation in Edinburgh”.
McCarthy spoke out as she told MPs on Westminster’s Scottish Affairs Committee that artists and venues involved with the Fringe were still suffering financially as a result of the Covid pandemic.
The event boss said: “There is no one across the Fringe landscape who is not still in a recovery position, not still carrying debts and deficits from just surviving Covid.”
Speaking about the rising costs that performers and others have to pay for accommodation in the city, McCarthy said: “That is definitely my grim reaper at the moment, and I think we need an Olympic response.”
READ MORE: Scotland 'hampered by Westminster' as Irish economy soars
Earlier this year, Festivals Edinburgh, which brings together the bosses of the city’s various festivals, warned they were facing an “economic shock” as a result of new short-term letting regulations.
McCarthy said while they were “very supportive of the short term lets legislation” – which involves new licences having to be awarded for properties rented out on a short term basis – she added it had “unintended consequences – particularly for artists”.
She said: “It is something that we need a strategic approach to address in a real way if we are to continue to host such a major event every year.”
Her comments came as she told MPs that both the Scottish and UK Governments could do more to help the festivals, which attract tens of thousands of performers and tourists to Edinburgh in August.
McCarthy said: “I think there is still huge opportunity both to invest in the festivals locally, because at the minute I think we all operate on shoestrings, we all operate on a huge amount of good will.
p>
“Our marketing budgets are miniscule and yet we have these global reputations. There is an enormous amount the Scottish and UK Governments could do to promote the festivals overseas.”
Meanwhile, Francesca Hegyi, the chief executive of the Edinburgh International Festival, said this was the first year they had received financial help from the UK Government – despite having being founded in 1947.
She said: “In the last eight years, we have 90 different instances of foreign governments investing in us, but the same isn’t said for Scottish Government colleagues or our UK Government colleagues.”
She described the summer festivals in the capital as being “enormous”, describing them as being “second only in size to an Olympic Games” – but adding that unlike the sporting tournament they happen every year.
Hegyi told MPs: “If you think of the effort that goes into staging a Commonwealth Games or even Eurovision over the weekend, it is sort of taken for granted we will happen every single year.”
With some locals having voiced concern about the impact the festivals have on the capital, she conceded there was an “uncomfortable relationship” between the events and local government.
But she insisted: “We all need to get around the table and work out what is a sustainable future, including sustainable tourism for Edinburgh and for the festivals.
“Because if we don’t, some of the festivals won’t be there in the next five years.”
In February, Festivals Edinburgh voiced fears that the introduction of licences for Airbnb-style lets could result in a third of the overall Fringe programme being lost.
In its written submission to MSPs, it noted the Fringe Society had made the “conservative estimate” that a third of its programme for 2024 could be lost with this “representing a minimum of £30 million in additional economic impact and nearly 700 FTE (full time equivalent) jobs in the first year alone”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel