“NOT for EU” labelling on British food products sold across the UK will be phased in gradually from this autumn, Foreign Secretary James Cleverly has said.
Cleverly told peers that during negotiations with retailers ahead of the signing of the Windsor Framework, UK-wide labelling was identified as the preferred option.
The labelling requirement is part of the Government’s deal with the EU to reduce checks on British products entering Northern Ireland.
The Foreign Secretary gave evidence to the House of Lords Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland Sub-Committee on the Windsor Framework, signed earlier this year to resolve trading difficulties between Northern Ireland and Great Britain, caused by the post-Brexit Northern Ireland Protocol.
READ MORE: South Lanarkshire Council publishes employee data online in FOI gaffe
Baroness Ritchie asked Cleverly to update the committee on the requirement for “Not for EU” food labelling.
She said retail representatives had raised concern about a lack of details ahead of an October 1 deadline.
Cleverly said during consultation with retailers, the “centre of gravity of the voices that we had was that UK-wide labelling was the preferred option”.
He added: “The practical point was that retailers were saying they would prefer a UK-wide regime, philosophically Northern Ireland is part of the UK so it seems logical that something we are asking Northern Ireland to do, we should ask the UK to do.
“I am very comfortable with having a UK-wide regime.”
Cleverly said that while autumn was the starting point for the plan, it would be phased in over a couple of years.
He added: “We have been talking about this for quite some time, including in the Command Paper in 2021, so this shouldn’t really be a surprise to the retail sector.
“Of course they will want to have details about size and prominence and I will get details about exactly how and when.
“It is not just a sudden start, we have been talking about this for a couple of years and it won’t be fully implemented for another couple of years.
“I am not a retailer, I don’t want to imply simplicity when there might be complexity, but this is something we discussed extensively with the retail sector, including those who said that labelling would be a good way of ensuring their products would be available in GB, not just in Northern Ireland.”
DUP peer Lord Dodds said that traders had also expressed concerns about new green and red lane arrangements to deal with the flow of goods from Britain into Northern Ireland.
He added: “We had evidence from a manufacturer a couple of weeks ago who said basically that most manufacturers would put everything through the red lane just for clarity.
READ MORE: Public Order Bill: Labour REFUSE to back SNP bid to repeal law
“We have heard evidence that the green lane is effectively a retail lane for goods that can be guaranteed to stay in Northern Ireland.
“How does that square with the Prime Minister’s statement that any sense of an Irish Sea border has been removed?”
Cleverly said he believed the commitment by the Prime Minister had largely been brought to reality.
He said he was willing to look at specific examples where concerns remained.
The Foreign Secretary added: “Northern Ireland’s relationship both with its proximity to the single market and its part of the United Kingdom means that complete perfection in all instances is not something that is ultimately deliverable.
“But I think we have in very large part made good on that promise to eradicate that sea border in Northern Ireland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel