IAN Murray has been accused of hypocrisy after claiming the SNP would let the Tories back into power – after himself nearly joining an “alliance” with Conservative MPs.
Scotland’s only Labour MP said the SNP had “let the cat out of the bag” after Aberdeen MP Kirsty Blackman said the party would vote against a minority Keir Starmer government if he failed to win a majority next year and doubled down on refusing indyref2.
He said: “What they’re essentially saying, and what Mhairi Black said, is there’s no difference between whether…they don’t care if there’s a Labour or Tory government and Kirsty’s saying they would bring down a Labour government and bring the Tories back in.”
This is the same Ian Murray who nearly defected to Change UK in 2019, a literal alliance between Conservative and Labour politicians https://t.co/CMqJv8K7UA
— Owen Jones (@OwenJones84) May 18, 2023
But his comments were skewered by commentator Owen Jones who brought up Murray’s flirtation with the doomed Change UK group of MPs.
It was reported in 2020 Murry had seriously considered joining the group of Labour and Conservative defectors – all of whom lost their seats at the election the year earlier – going as far as to rehearse a speech announcing he had jumped ship.
READ MORE: Ian Murray nearly quit Labour for now-defunct Independent Group
He released a statement at the time saying he had changed his mind at the last minute and wanted to “fight” for Labour.
Jones said: “This is the same Ian Murray who nearly defected to Change UK in 2019, a literal alliance between Conservative and Labour politicians.”
He added: “Imagine nearly joining Tories in the same political party, and then denouncing your opponents for risking letting the Tories in. Couldn't be me!”
Murray was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel