THE UK statistics watchdog has sent a warning to Jeremy Hunt following an inaccuracy in his tweets last month.
The Chancellor claimed public debt levels would fall in the coming years when in fact they are simply forecast to rise less steeply than previously expected. The UK Statistics Authority (UKSA) has now written a letter to him reminding him about the importance of accuracy. Whoops…
On the back of this, we’ve dug up a selection of other times the Tories have been in trouble with the UKSA...
David Cameron on EU migrants benefits claims
Former prime minister David Cameron was called out in 2015 when he set out proposed reforms for how EU migrants could claim benefits when they come to the UK.
He claimed 43% of EU migrants claimed benefits within four years of arriving in the UK. This led to Full Fact reporting him to the UKSA as Downing Street provided no indication of where this figure had come from.
The watchdog’s chair Sir Andrew Dilnot, said the Government’s handling of the release of the figures was “disappointing” and “unsatisfactory” and that officials had been “spoken with”.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf tells Rishi Sunak to act on pumped-storage hydro projects
Dilnot said in a letter: “The release of these statistics without the subsequent accompanying background material explaining the methodology used made it hard for those interested to understand and scrutinise the statistics, which was clearly unsatisfactory.”
Boris Johnson’s ‘£350 million a week’ claim
Another former prime minister, Boris Johnson, came under fire from the watchdog when he claimed the Government would have £350 million extra a week to spend if the UK left the EU.
The figure formed the centrepiece of the Vote Leave campaign and was plastered over the side of a bus that carried Johnson and other Brexiteers around the UK.
The UKSA accused the then-foreign secretary of a “clear misuse of official statistics”.
George Osbourne releases CPI too early
Former chancellor George Osbourne was pulled up by the authority in 2011 for releasing the Consumer Price Index 17 hours early to hundreds of ministers, officials and advisers.
Only 17 Treasury staff were allowed to see the market sensitive information 24 hours before official release.
In a letter, the authority chief Sir Michael Scholar said: “Why do 50 or more people need to have the CPI a day ahead of the opposition, Parliament, the public, and the media?
“There is, I believe, no good operational reason, but successive governments want the political advantage that such prior knowledge confers on them: that is, time to work out their line; and therefore time to spin.”
NHS real-term spending blunder
Hunt’s latest mistake is not the first time he’s been told off by the statistics watchdog.
In 2012, the UK Government claimed real-term spending on the NHS had increased since 2009/10.
READ MORE: Most voters say Brexit was a mistake, new YouGov poll finds
But the authority disagreed. It said in a letter to Hunt, who was then health secretary, that the Treasury’s own figures revealed “expenditure on the NHS in real-terms was lower in 2011-12 than it was in 2009-10”.
Shailesh Vara on legal aid earnings
Former courts and legal aid minister Shailesh Vara was pulled up in 2014 by the UKSA after the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) misleadingly claimed barristers earn an average of £84,000 from legal aid.
The watchdog discovered the MoJ had used the mean fee income from public funds for full-time barristers and also excluded barriers who earned less than £10,000 a year from public funds.
The figure also included VAT, which barristers must pay to HMRC, and expenses such as travel costs.
Dillnot said to Vara in a letter: “Use of the mean, rather than the median, results in a higher estimate as the calculation is influenced by a small number of larger payments.”
The MoJ announced at the time it would carry out a review to improve the transparency of its statistics.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel