JACKIE Weaver has insisted Scotland’s community councils could be improved by being given more autonomy instead of being “kept in line”.
The unlikely internet sensation – who went viral after ejecting councillors from a virtual Handforth Parish Council meeting in 2021 - appeared in front of Holyrood’s Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee on Tuesday as the 50th anniversary of community councils was marked.
The session was part of the committee’s ongoing work looking at the Scottish Government’s Local Governance Review which aims to reform the way that Scotland is governed to give greater control to communities.
There are around 1200 community councils and they act as a bridge between communities and councils, but they have fewer powers than similar bodies in England and Wales.
READ MORE: Scottish Tory MPs vote to include Scotland in UK anti-strike laws
Unlike in the rest of Britain, Scottish community councils do not have tax-raising powers and are dependent upon local authority funding.
When asked what she felt the strengths were of the system in England compared to Scotland, Weaver – who is chief officer at the Cheshire Association of Local Councils - said town and parish councils south of the Border had more autonomy and in many cases have a bigger immediate impact on people’s lives.
She told the committee: “I think it’s very interesting to hear they [community councils] are valued in Scotland and yet in some ways they are also kept in line, so they have no autonomy.
“For me, what I’ve seen, in my career of 25 years, [is] that there has been an enormous change in England.
“I would say 25 years ago our town and parish councils were very much like your community councils, but they had tax raising powers, but they didn’t do very much with them at all.
“What we’ve seen is our central government funding has reduced in England dramatically for our principal authorities and we see our town and parish councils stepping up and filling the gaps and these very community based things actually make a huge difference.
“People think the biggest issue might be highways or adult social care – of course, they are very important. But the things that really impact people’s daily lives are things that happen next door to you and that’s where our town and parish councils come into their own.”
Elsewhere in the discussion, the committee heard from a panel of community councillors representing Edinburgh, Shetland, Aberdeenshire, West Lothian, Moray, Clackmannanshire and Cambuslang in South Lanarkshire.
Discussing local government with MSPs, @jackieweaver says Scotland's community councils could be given more autonomy instead of being "kept in line". pic.twitter.com/t7Ms2rKkS3
— Holyrood magazine (@HolyroodDaily) May 23, 2023
Oliver Escobar, senior lecturer in public policy at the University of Edinburgh, acknowledged community councils often attracted “unfair criticism” as they do a lot of work “with limited resources”.
He added they were “refreshing” because they were non-partisan and were often behind many exciting local renewal projects.
But he admitted there was a “patchy landscape” of community councils across the country. Despite the fact there are around 1200 across the country, not all of them have members and many of them do not have contested elections, and Escobar said it was almost a “miracle” they had kept going for 50 years.
Emma Swift, a communications officer at the Improvement Service organisation, said community councils should be promoted more to young people as a part of a career path to becoming a councillor or politician.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here