THE introduction of juryless trials for sexual offences is to be considered in England and Wales as part of justice reforms despite huge outcry over a pilot announced in Scotland.
The Law Commission of England and Wales has published a consultation on a series of proposals which it says are aimed at “countering the effects of rape myths and misconceptions on the trial process, treating complainants humanely, and ensuring that defendants receive a fair trial”.
One of the issues examined in the paper is the use of juryless trials, with views being sought on the “mandatory removal of juries from sexual offences trials currently heard in the Crown Court”.
In Scotland, plans for a pilot of juryless trials for rape to see the impact on conviction rates have resulted in a major backlash within the legal profession, with a near unanimous boycott of the pilot by lawyers looming.
READ MORE: Justice Secretary responds to boycott threat for judge-only rape trial pilot
Other proposals suggested for England and Wales include judicial oversight of how a victim’s personal records are accessed and disclosed, including counselling notes and a new framework for restricting the use of evidence of a victim’s sexual behaviour.
The Law Commission, which was asked by the UK Government to examine the use of evidence in sexual offences prosecutions, said: “While progress has been made, evidence shows that the criminal justice process for rape and serious sexual offences is still flawed, and more can be done to ensure sexual offences are tried justly, without traumatising complainants.”
It says that its new consultation paper “sets out proposals aimed at countering the effects of rape myths and misconceptions on the trial process, treating complainants humanely, and ensuring that defendants receive a fair trial”.
It added: “Rape myths are genuine and sincere beliefs that are factually incorrect and often derived from stereotypes.”
Among those threatening to boycott the juryless trials pilot in Scotland is high-profile Glasgow-based lawyer Aamer Anwar.
Anwar, who is a close friend of First Minister Humza Yousaf, said in an interview in the Daily Express today: “It is all very well having politicians, who have never spent a day in court, wanting a system that reflects the needs of modern-day Scotland.
“But they then arrogantly ignore the views of those who have given a lifetime to working in our courts and if that’s not palatable then why not ask real jurors why they acquit, why cherry pick the views of victims that suits a political agenda.”
In response to his comments a spokesman for the Scottish Government said: “Piloting judge-only rape trials was a recommendation of a review carried out by Lady Dorrian, Scotland’s second most senior judge, to improve how the justice system treats rape victims.
READ MORE: Aberdeen lawyers reportedly join boycott of juryless rape trials pilot
“We have worked closely with the legal sector and will continue to do so during the development and evaluation of the pilot.
“There is overwhelming evidence both from within Scotland and beyond that jurors are subject to preconceptions about rape that can impact the verdicts they reach – which is not the case in other serious crime trials.
“Over 80% of criminal trials in Scotland are already conducted without a jury.
“Judge-only trials for serious offences including rape already take place in many other jurisdictions such as the Netherlands and France.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel