A SCIENTIST from the University of Stirling is leading an investigation into whether global warming causes increased carbon emissions from ecosystems in the Arctic.
Philip Wookey, a professor in ecosystem ecology, will carry out experiments in northern Sweden with a team which includes investigators from the James Hutton Institute in Aberdeen and the University of Edinburgh.
The group will also carry out research in the Scottish Highlands, an environment that has much in common with the Arctic tundra.
The announcement of £1m in funding for the project comes after the World Meteorological Organisation revealed there is now a 66% chance the planet will pass the 1.5 Celsius global warming threshold between now and 2027.
READ MORE: Westminster could override legislation designed to protect devolution
The study is one of 44 environmental research projects awarded a share of £25m invested by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), one of seven research councils which make up UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), which is the national funding agency investing in science and research in the UK.
“This investment supports researchers’ curiosity and imagination to enable discoveries that unlock new knowledge,” said Professor Duncan Wingham, executive chair of NERC.
“By supporting high risk, high reward environmental science, we are harnessing the full power of the UK’s research and innovation system to tackle large-scale, complex challenges.”
Rising temperatures are having a dramatic effect on the Arctic landscape. Trees and tall shrubs are growing in areas formerly too cold for them to establish, meaning tree lines are gradually creeping up. Shrubby vegetation is also spreading and growing taller as warm seasons lengthen.
However, it is not yet clear if this Arctic greening is resulting in changes in net carbon exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere.
Plants do draw CO2 from the atmosphere via photosynthesis. But at the same time, CO2 is released from the soil and, in the Arctic, changes below ground may be disproportionately important.
With increased productivity and changes in vegetation composition, where plants are rooting in extremely carbon rich soils, there is concern that processes in the rooting zone (the rhizosphere) could result in a net loss of carbon, back to the atmosphere as CO2.
Wookey and his team will carry experiments which will test whether vegetation change could turbo-charge the mycorrhizosphere - the microhabitat in soil where plant roots are surrounded by fungus – resulting in a net loss of carbon from soils to the atmosphere.
They will investigate how the presence of plant roots, and their associated mycorrhizal fungi, could accelerate the decomposition of pre-existing soil organic matter. Mycorrhizal fungi access nutrients from the soil for their plant hosts, however, some may increase soil carbon loss.
The team are setting up experiments at tree line areas of Arctic Sweden to work out which fungi are growing with pioneer trees and how much CO2 loss to the atmosphere they are causing. In the lab, the team will culture (or grow) these fungi and carry out more experiments to understand their role in soil decomposition.
READ MORE: Suella Braverman cleared of rule breach as Boris Johnson allies rage
By comparing these processes in contrasting vegetation communities, they can assess how ongoing and predicted changes in plant communities, from tundra heath to shrub and forest, would affect net ecosystem carbon exchange with the atmosphere.
Wookey said: “Many high-profile research papers have equated Arctic greening with increased net carbon sequestration from the atmosphere. Although logical and intuitive, this overlooks the potential fate of pre-existing soil organic carbon in these regions.
“This is a problem because soils at high latitudes are notably carbon rich. Although challenging to investigate, we cannot overlook below-ground processes if we are to understand net carbon budgets on timescales relevant to the Climate Emergency.
"Understanding the fundamental mechanisms controlling the accumulation, stability, and loss of soil organic matter is as essential for predicting the Earth's future climate as understanding photosynthesis and plant productivity.
“We hypothesise that associated changes in the mycorrhizosphere could, paradoxically, result in net losses, rather than gains, of soil carbon.
"By applying ground-breaking techniques, we will transform our understanding of this process and the fundamental new knowledge gained will significantly improve regional and global modelling of climate change.
"This project is especially timely, given the major policy emphasis and public interest in tree planting for carbon sequestration.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here