HIGHLAND Council has U-turned on its decision to ban bouncy castles in the region after local businesses hit out at the move.
The authority initially said it was putting a “foreseeable pause” on the letting of inflatable castles at its premises for health and safety reasons.
It also claimed the size of the area was making it difficult for its staff to get to venues, including the region’s more than 200 schools, to carry out proper risk assessments.
Speaking to the Inverness Courier last week, a spokesperson for the council said the ban had been put in place due to concerns over accidents.
They said that while the council recognised that bouncy castles and slides were a much-loved addition to local events, hired inflatables required thorough risk assessments and quality checks by experienced staff.
However, at the time Inverness-based inflatables firm Mascot Madness Entertainment challenged the decision, asking for a detailed explanation of why it had been taken.
Business owners Danielle and Aly said: “This proposed insane ruling will be impossible to enforce and police at any time.
“Do they also expect to impose this on the many residents within the Highland region who occupy residential council-owned properties?
“We are currently fearing for the future of our business, and it also means that kids are missing out again.”
However, on Wednesday, the council reversed its decision, in an effort to act “in a way that does not impact unnecessarily on community activities”.
READ MORE: Suella Braverman cleared of rule breach as Boris Johnson allies rage
The authority said that further discussion had resulted in updated conditions of let requirements in the area, which will be shared with venues and contractors alike.
The conditions will allow the council to ensure:
- Inflatables meet all required safety standards.
- Operators and contractors can prove they have carried out the appropriate risk assessments.
- Operators and contractors hold the appropriate insurance to cover risk to users of the inflatables, and to cover any other risks which may arise from their use on council premises.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel