THE UK Government has been accused of showing “utter disregard for devolution” as the row over the Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) deepens.
On Friday morning, the BBC reported that the UK Government is likely to issue a “conditional agreement” that would permit Scotland to run a pilot of a UK-wide deposit return scheme.
It comes after weeks of a bitter dispute between the two governments over whether or not the DRS will be given an exemption to the UK Internal Market Act to allow it to go ahead.
However, ministers are now expected to require glass bottles to be excluded from the scheme, which was a key strand of the Scottish Government’s policy.
READ MORE: Toni Giugliano: SNP 'need space' to decide route at Independence Convention
Circular economy minister Lorna Slater, who is spearheading the policy, said she saw “no justification” for the UK Government’s actions, that Scottish ministers had not been told of any decision and said the Scottish Parliament was being treated “with contempt”.
Earlier, Deputy First Minister Shona Robison told BBC’s Good Morning Scotland that the UK Government was “interfering”.
Scottish Greens minister Slater (pictured below) blasted the UK Government on Friday morning after reports emerged.
“Once again the UK Government has shown utter disregard for devolution,” she said.
“Scottish ministers have, as yet, received no notice of their decision.
“This is treating the Scottish Parliament with contempt.
“If press reports are accurate, this would be an eleventh-hour decision from the UK Government to unilaterally remove glass from Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme which would ride roughshod over the devolution settlement, undermine our efforts to protect our environment and reduce climate emissions.
“We can see no justification for their reported actions, which would undermine their own climate targets.”
Slater said that if glass is removed, around six hundred million bottles that would have been collected through the scheme will be excluded, despite the investment businesses had already made in preparation for the scheme going ahead.
READ MORE: Labour 'complacent' over Rutherglen by-election, blasts Humza Yousaf
“If this decision turns out as reported, many of these bottles would unnecessarily end up as broken glass on our streets, our parks and our beaches,” Slater added.
"We remain committed to the delivery of a successful Deposit Return Scheme, but we would need to fully consider the implications for the successful delivery of the scheme and discuss these with businesses and delivery partners. I intend to provide an update to parliament as soon as possible.”
The BBC reports that other conditions on the DRS that could be imposed on Scotland include standardising the deposit charge, bar codes and labelling across the UK.
Aileen McHarg, professor in public law and human rights at the University of Durham, shared the BBC report, adding: "If ever you needed proof that the UK Internal Market Act amounted to a vehicle for the recentralisation of power, here it is."
If ever you needed proof that the UK Internal Market Act amounted to a vehicle for the recentralisation of power, here it is - https://t.co/S7esuebd9s
— Aileen McHarg @AileenMcHarg@mastodon.scot (@AileenMcHarg) May 26, 2023
It has also been suggested that the UK will insist on a “reciprocal membership system” so that businesses who join anywhere in the UK re automatically signed up across all four nations.
"It is an outrage that in an area that is fully devolved that the UK government and the Secretary of State for Scotland Alister Jack would seek to interfere yet again in a scheme that is wholly devolved for no other reason really than because they can,” Robison told the BBC.
She added: "We will look at what comes back from the UK Government."
The DRS, which is aimed at increasing the number of single-use cans and bottles which are recycled, was due to begin in August but has now been delayed until March next year.
READ MORE: Question Time: Theo Paphitis bemused by Tory MP's immigration stance
The Scotland Office has been contacted for comment.
It comes after Scottish Secretary Alister Jack claimed that Scottish Government ministers had not provided the correct paperwork on time to allow for an exemption for the Internal Market Act.
Slater refuted this in the Holyrood chamber last week, and said UK officials had asked for additional paperwork, which had been provided.
A row also broke out over which government would pay compensation to businesses if the scheme collapsed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel