NICOLA Sturgeon has weighed in on a growing devolution row over a reported attempt by the UK Government to exclude glass from Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme (DRS).
The former first minister made the comments after circular economy minister Lorna Slater blasted the move as showing “utter disregard for devolution”
On Friday morning, it emerged that the UK Government is likely to issue a “conditional agreement” that would permit Scotland to run a pilot of a UK-wide deposit return scheme.
READ MORE: Labour 'acting like they've already won' Rutherglen by-election, Humza Yousaf says
However, this would require glass to be removed from the scheme and prompted a furious response from Slater.
And, SNP MSP Sturgeon also weighed in on the row as it developed on Friday afternoon.
Taking to social media, the former first minister wrote: “‘You can have devolved powers but use them only if you do exactly what we tell you’ is not devolution in any meaningful sense.
“Increasingly obvious that real self-government requires independence.”
The UK Government is currently considering if the Scottish DRS can be exempted from the UK Internal Market Act, legislation brought in after Brexit to govern trade between the four nations of the UK.
‘You can have devolved powers but use them only if you do exactly what we tell you’ is not devolution in any meaningful sense. Increasingly obvious that real self government requires independence. https://t.co/18LBnwARik
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) May 26, 2023
Scotland is due to implement DRS in March next year, ahead of the rest of the UK the following year, and the UK Government has argued it will create barriers for trade.
Unlike the proposals for England and Northern Ireland, Scotland’s DRS currently includes glass bottles as well as plastic bottles and cans.
The BBC reported that other conditions on the DRS that could be imposed on Scotland include standardising the deposit charge, bar codes and labelling across the UK.
It has also been suggested that the UK will insist on a “reciprocal membership system” so that businesses who join anywhere in the UK are automatically signed up across all four nations.
READ MORE: Question Time: Theo Paphitis bemused by Tory MP's immigration stance
We told how Slater said Scottish government ministers had not been informed of any decision yet, and said UK ministers were treating Holyrood “with contempt”.
“If press reports are accurate, this would be an eleventh hour decision from the UK Government to unilaterally remove glass from Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme which would ride roughshod over the devolution settlement, undermine our efforts to protect our environment and reduce climate emissions,” Slater said.
“We can see no justification for their reported actions, which would undermine their own climate targets.”
The Scotland Office has been contacted for comment.
It comes after Scottish Secretary Alister Jack claimed that Scottish Government ministers had not provided the correct paperwork on time to allow for an exemption for the Internal Market Act.
Slater refuted this in the Holyrood chamber last week, and said UK officials had asked for additional paperwork, which had been provided.
A row also broke out over which government would pay compensation to businesses, if the scheme collapsed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel