IT would be a “democratic outrage” if the UK Government rules glass must be excluded from Scotland’s deposit return scheme (DRS), the First Minister has said.
Speculation is mounting that UK ministers will only allow the scheme to proceed north of the border if glass bottles are removed from its remit, with further conditions placed on the scheme.
That is despite Holyrood passing regulations which mean glass bottles, as well as plastic bottles and drinks cans, are included in deposit returns.
It comes after Scottish Greens minister Lorna Slater released a furious statement at the expected move by the UK Tories, and said they were showing "utter disregard for devolution".
READ MORE: Labour 'complacent' over Rutherglen by-election, blasts Humza Yousaf
Meanwhile, environmental campaigners insisted the removal of glass would amount to “sabotage” by the UK Government.
Even former first minister Nicola Sturgeon weighed in as the news emerged on Friday.
Humza Yousaf told STV: “If press reports are true and they are going to unilaterally demand that glass is removed from the scheme, even though the Scottish Parliament passed regulations to include glass in the scheme, then to me that is a democratic outrage.”
Yousaf said the UK Government had briefed the media on its plans “as opposed to writing to the Scottish Government”, insisting this is a “further demonstration of the contempt they hold devolution in”, and part of a “systematic pattern of behaviour from the UK Government to do what they can to undermine devolution”.
His comments came as ministers in London are considering if the Scottish DRS can be exempted from the UK Internal Market Act, legislation brought in after Brexit to regulate trade between the four nations of the UK.
Scotland is due to implement DRS in March next year, ahead of the rest of the UK the following year.
However, glass bottles are not included in DRS schemes planned in England and Northern Ireland.
Noting that ministers at Holyrood have not yet been informed of any decision, Slater accused the Tory UK Government of “treating the Scottish Parliament with contempt”.
READ MORE: Question Time: Theo Paphitis bemused by Tory MP's immigration stance
She added: “An 11th-hour decision from the UK Government to unilaterally remove glass from Scotland’s deposit return scheme… would ride roughshod over the devolution settlement, undermine our efforts to protect our environment and reduce climate emissions.”
Slater said the Scottish Government can “see no justification” for such a move, saying it would “undermine” UK climate targets.
All but six of the 51 deposit return schemes operating elsewhere in the world include glass, the Scottish Government said – adding that forcing Scotland to remove it from its scheme would mean recycling rates for glass bottles remain at an “unacceptable” 63%.
Slater (pictured above) added: “If this decision turns out as reported, many of these bottles would unnecessarily end up as broken glass on our streets, our parks and our beaches.”
She said the Scottish Government remains “committed to the delivery of a successful deposit return scheme” – but stressed it will “need to fully consider the implications for the successful delivery of the scheme”.
She vowed to give an update to MSPs as soon as possible.
Meanwhile, the Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland, which has led the campaign to introduce DRS, said removing glass from it would be a “Westminster attempt to put a spanner in the works” of the initiative.
READ MORE: Ash Regan: SNP independence convention should include Yes movement
Director Kat Jones said such a move “should send a chill down the spine of anyone hoping for environmental progress through devolution”.
She added: “Removing glass from the Scottish system would leave a costly and dangerous burden on councils, climate and our countryside.
“We remain confident that the Scottish Government can make this work, given the importance of what remains.
“But this would be an attempt at sabotage, nothing more, nothing less.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel