THE Scottish Government is trying to speed up the remediation process for buildings affected by unsafe cladding, a minister has said.
Housing minister Paul McLennan admitted it is taking “too long” for many homeowners to have their properties assessed.
The Grenfell tower fire of 2017 led to a number of fire safety changes, including a ban on combustible cladding for high-rise buildings.
Work is underway in Scotland to identify which buildings have unsafe cladding and how it can be removed.
On Monday, it emerged that an in-principle agreement had been reached with developers which could lead to them covering the costs for removing unsafe cladding installed when the properties were built.
McLennan spoke at Holyrood’s Housing Committee on Tuesday, where he updated MSPs on a pilot programme to identify buildings at risk.
He said: “I appreciate that for many homeowners this process has taken too long.”
This programme looked at 105 buildings around Scotland, he said, with assessments under way in 27 of these.
Opposition parties at Holyrood have previously called for faster action in removing unsafe cladding from residential buildings.
Conservative MSP Annie Wells asked the minister when residents could expect to see work start.
He said there was no “one size fits all” answer to this due to the different buildings involved.
The Government is developing legislation aimed at speeding up the process, he said.
He said: “Part of the reason for bringing forward some of the legislation is to try and quicken the pace on what we need to do in terms of the buildings.”
The minister said he hoped the new accord with housebuilders would also speed up progress.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel