A NEARLY four-year bribery investigation into the owner of Ladbrokes could end in a “substantial financial penalty”.
Entain said it is in talks with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and admitted misconduct “may have occurred”.
The two sides are trying to reach a so-called deferred prosecution agreement, which removes the threat of prosecution for a company if it lives up to certain conditions.
The case is a bribery investigation into Entain’s former subsidiary in Turkey.
Authorities opened a probe into its suppliers in 2019, expanding it less than a year later to look at wrongdoing within the Entain group itself.
Entain sold the Turkish-facing online betting and gaming business in 2017.
On Wednesday, Entain said it “acknowledges that historical misconduct involving former third party suppliers and former employees of the group may have occurred”.
It said the investigation includes, but is not limited to, section seven of the Bribery Act.
This means a company is guilty of an offence if it benefits by retaining business or an advantageous business condition from someone paying a bribe.
Entain said: “While the company cannot say at this stage what the consequences of the investigation will be, it is likely that they will include a substantial financial penalty which is yet to be determined.
“The company cannot identify reliably at this stage the size of any financial penalty.”
Entain – at the time known as GVC – sold the Turkish business before being taken over by Ladbrokes Coral in a £3.6 billion deal.
It was told about the investigation in 2020 but at the time said it had not been given enough clarity by HM Revenue and Customs.
On Wednesday, it said: “Since the investigation first commenced, the group has undertaken a comprehensive review of anti-bribery policies and procedures and has taken action to strengthen its wider compliance programme and related controls.
“Whilst the discussions with the CPS remain ongoing, the board is content with progress to date and looks forward to pursuing an orderly conclusion to this matter.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here