A SCOTTISH Government minister has said that stopping all future activity in the North Sea would be “wrong” and could threaten the country’s energy security after Keir Starmer confirmed that a Labour government would block all new domestic oil and gas developments.
Starmer is expected to formally set out the proposals during a visit to Scotland in June.
However, it is believed that the party’s policy will involve a ban on granting new oil and gas licences and funnelling the money into wind and nuclear energy instead.
But Mairi McAllan, the Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero, told The Times that “simply stopping all future activity is wrong”.
She said: “The unlimited extraction of fossil fuels is not consistent with Scotland’s ambitious climate obligations but we also have to ensure a planned and fair transition that leaves no one behind.
“That means simply stopping all future activity is wrong. It could threaten energy security while destroying the very skills we need to transition to the new low-carbon economy.”
It comes after unions and industry bodies reacted with concern towards Labour’s proposal, with the general secretary of Unite, Sharon Graham, calling for more detail.
“When Keir Starmer decided to let the world know that he would halt new oil and gas production in the North Sea he left out everything that was important – the detail,” she said.
“Labour must now be very clear that they will not let workers pay the price for the transition to renewable energy. When it comes to jobs we can’t have jam tomorrow.
“We cannot have a repeat of the devastation wrought on workers and their communities by the closure of the coal mines.”
READ MORE: BBC Scottish independence article LEAVES OUT Unionists' political history
Gillian Martin, the SNP MSP for Aberdeenshire East who previously worked in public relations for the oil and gas industry, also hit out at Labour’s plans.
Speaking at an Energy Voice event, Martin said she was surprised at the “lack of nuance” in the announcement, claimed the policy was “too simplistic” and that it “would make people in the oil and gas industry feel a little bit uneasy”.
In its draft energy strategy published in January, the Scottish Government announced that it was consulting whether there should be a presumption against any new oil and gas exploration included in its final energy strategy.
But climate activists have called on both Labour and the SNP to put forward policies that outline exactly how the transition away from oil and gas will work.
Tessa Khan, the executive director of climate group Uplift, told The National: "The science is clear that we can’t afford new oil and gas if we hope to maintain a habitable climate, and the last year has also taught us that an affordable, secure energy supply also requires us to rapidly transition away from oil and gas.
“Labour’s position on the North Sea recognises this, and what we now need to see from Labour and the SNP are policies that can support Scotland to gain from the transition, including sustainable jobs and a thriving green economy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel