A MEMBER of the audience on BBC Scotland’s Debate Night was applauded after he spelled out why he had changed his opinion from supporting the Union to “absolutely” backing independence.
The show saw SNP MSP Jim Fairlie and Alba leader Alex Salmond argue the case for independence, while Tory MSP Roz McCall, Labour MSP Claire Baker, and Scots LibDem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton made the case for the Union.
In one memorable moment, one member of the audience told the three Unionist representatives that they needed to “take a hard look” at themselves.
She started: “You’re busy blaming the Scottish Government …”
One of the politicians attempted to cut in off the audience member, forcing the host, Stephen Jardine, to intervene to allow them to continue.
She asked them to have the “courtesy” to listen to her point in full, eliciting a frown from Cole-Hamilton (above), before going on: “Westminster cuts the budget to Scotland from the revenue we send down.
"It gets continually cut and you’re busy slagging off the NHS, ‘they’re not doing their job properly’, they’re not getting the funding from the Scottish Government needs to look at this.”
Cole-Hamilton then argued it “wasn’t about cuts from Westminster” but “direct choices the SNP government have made over 16 years”.
READ MORE: Pro-republic campaigners seek Holyrood support for abolishing monarchy lobbying
The audience member also argued for more locally sourced food and other groceries, saying that too many goods are shipped into Scotland and not enough is produced within the country.
Elsewhere in the show, another audience member said he had seen the effect independence had on other small nations while spending time abroad – and argued for Scotland to do the same.
“I know it’s difficult to judge priorities and get that right,” he started, before arguing that independence would likely need to come before change, not the other way around.
📣 "The whole arrangement has changed".
— Olaf Stando 🌻 (@olafdoesstuff) May 31, 2023
🔥 Watch as this #bbcdn audience member from Perth perfectly explains why he switched from backing the Union to now backing independence.
👇 He's right - small countries across the world thrive with independence. Why not Scotland? pic.twitter.com/402AlPO2Wi
“I’ve spent a bit of time in some other countries, small countries, who are doing very nicely thank you very much. Places like Estonia, places like Mauritius, who are envied by their neighbouring Reunion because as a department of France they can’t do the things that they can do in Mauritius.
“It’s just looking at that bigger picture.”
The audience member said that he was living in England in 2014 so could not vote in the independence referendum, but he would have backed the Union.
He then went on: “Unfortunately there was another irresponsible referendum after that in 2016 and we’re now in a situation where the whole arrangement has changed.”
He added that he would “absolutely” now vote for independence, sparking applause, before going on: “We need to get that first, and then move to addressing the other [issues]. It’s a question of priorities.”
The Debate Night broadcast also saw Salmond, the former first minister, argue for exploration and extraction to continue in the North Sea – with offset requirements being in place.
The Alba leader said there was an “expectation of £80 billion coming in over the next few years in oil and gas revenues and by devoting a small portion of that to invest in Scottish carbon capture projects, we can be using that pipeline network to get the carbon dioxide back into the North Sea, which is enough to store 200 years worth of UK emissions”.
“So instead of pushing North Sea jobs off a precipitous height or talking about a just transition that can’t be met in that timescale, why don’t we invest in the technology which might make an oil and gas future compliant with the future of the planet,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel