A SCOTTISH Labour frontbencher dropped out of hosting and attending a gender critical event following a formal complaint to the party.
Pauline McNeill, MSP for Glasgow region, was due to hold an event titled “The Meaning of Sex Under the Equality Act 2010”, alongside representatives from Sex Matters, in Holyrood next week.
Scotland’s gender reforms, which would have introduced self-identification for transgender people, were passed with cross-party support at the end of last year.
READ MORE: PMQs: Oliver Dowden in King's coronation rant after SNP raise economy
However, the UK Government used a Section 35 order to block the legislation from Royal Assent and becoming law. The UK Government said that the reforms would affect UK-wide equality laws, with the decision now subject to a legal challenge from the Scottish Government.
McNeill, Scottish Labour’s justice spokesperson, has been critical of the reforms, did not vote on the final stage of the bill in December last year, alongside Michael Marra and retained her spokesperson role.
Carol Mochan and Claire Baker, who both voted against the reforms, lost their front-bench positions.
McNeill was due to co-host the event with SNP MSP Ash Regan (pictured above), who resigned from her role as community safety minister over her opposition to the reforms.
The event is due to include contributions from controversial gender critical activists, including Maya Forstater, barrister Noami Cunningham, Michael Foran, a legal academic at Glasgow University, and Helen Joyce, author of Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality.
Sex Matters was founded by Forstater and Cunningham, and is currently campaigning to amend the UK Equality Act to include biological sex as a protected characteristic.
READ MORE: Malcolm Offord whisky firm shares 'raises questions' over DRS stance
According to reports, the event would have been subject to “Chatham House rules”, where information can be taken from the discussion, but not attributed to any of the attendees.
However, McNeill has now pulled out of the event after a formal complaint.
A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: “Pauline McNeill MSP will not be attending or hosting this event.”
Joanna Cherry, an SNP MP and vocal gender critical campaigner blasted the decision on social media.
“What a disgrace,” she wrote. “Discrimination and silencing of free speech should have no place in Scotland’s parliament. Many [lesbian, gay and bisexual] people and indeed some [transgender] are gender critical.
“Our rights to be same-sex attracted are not conditional on accepting gender identity theory.”
READ MORE: SNP won't 'officially decide' independence strategy at convention
The Scotsman reported that the complaint said the timing of the event and its invite, which was sent on the first day of Pride Month and to all MSPs, “appears to be a deliberate attack on trans people and their allies”.
A Scottish Labour source told the newspaper it was the right decision for McNeill to step away from the event, but added it should never have been organised in the first place.
They said: "This is the right decision, but Pauline should never have organised it in the first place and I hope she apologises publicly for it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel