THE SNP received just £4000 in donations in the first three months of 2023, new reports from the Electoral Commission have revealed.
In comparison, the Conservatives were given £12.1 million – including a single donation of £5m from a dictator-linked Egyptian billionaire.
The Tory party also received two donations of £2m, one from Amit Lohia – the billionaire “prince of polyester” – and another from Graham H Edwards, a commercial property magnate.
Labour were handed £4.4 million in donations over the first three months of 2023. The largest, which was worth £725,250, came from Unite the Union.
The LibDems were given £1.3 million in donations over the period.
The SNP’s single £4000 donation came from a James Murdoch, according to the Electoral Commission reports.
The party’s Westminster group did also take three payments of £95,779 from the House of Commons to fund their activities.
The Scottish Green Party received no donations over the first three months of the year, according to the newly published records.
The Ulster Unionist Party, DUP, and Plaid Cymru all also received no donations over the period.
The Green Party of England and Wales were given £168,926 over the period, including an £8000 donation from sculptor Antony Gormley.
In total, political parties registered in the UK reported accepting £20,887,106 in donations and public funds during the first quarter of 2023, according to the Electoral Commission figures.
This compares to £12,792,415 accepted in the same period in 2022.
Of the £20.8m accepted, £2,520,706 was public funding.
READ MORE: Dictator-linked billionaire hands Tories biggest single donation for 20 years
The Electoral Commission noted: “Parties will likely have received other donations, from different individuals or bodies, that are below the thresholds for reporting to the Commission. Taken as a total sum these can amount to substantial sources of income for parties.”
Louise Edwards, the Electoral Commission’s director of regulation and digital transformation, said: “We publish details of these donations so that voters understand how political parties are funded. We know transparency of party and campaigner finance is important for people, but our research tells us that only 24 per cent of people believe party funding is transparent.
“It’s clear that publishing this information is not enough. We continue to recommend to the UK Government that it reforms the system, to help protect parties from those who seek to evade the law, and give voters more confidence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel